lower expenditure

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lower expenditure" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing financial matters, particularly in contexts where reducing costs or spending is a focus. Example: "The company aims to achieve lower expenditure in the upcoming fiscal year to improve profitability."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

30 human-written examples

Private participation in healthcare is associated with higher (not lower) expenditure.

The Guardian - Opinion

The small deficit was due to increased revenue and lower expenditure than in 1994.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Lower expenditure on Arab schools is partly responsible for drop-out rates almost double that of Jews.

The Economist

The Google Videos situation shows that in order to lower expenditure and adjust its priorities, Google was willing to delete content entrusted to it by users.

The Guardian - Opinion

Their corporate purveyors promised higher yields with better pest control and lower expenditure on chemicals.The technology has yet to deliver on all its promises, but has provided enough benefit to keep farmers planting.

The Economist

When a similar divergence occurred in the mid-1980s, policymakers focused on the lower expenditure measure, and thus failed to spot the impending boom.In this section An unhealthy silence Going ape The next Tory leader HMS Clink Boondoggle Pilot error Digital adventure Dubious data Labour's migraine Reprints.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

30 human-written examples

[Associated Press] From Syracuse, N.Y., to Minneapolis, many American cities racked up savings this winter because the unusually mild weather required far lower expenditures on snow and ice removal.

The New York Times

"The implications are that, at some point, you're going to have to see higher taxes, lower expenditures or a combination of both," said Carmen Reinhart, an economist at the University of Maryland.

The New York Times

What is known is that elderly households tend to have lower incomes and lower expenditures than younger households, and that more of their purchases are for needs that cannot be met by switching to products and services in unrelated categories.

The New York Times

As the 2011 annual report of the Medicare trustees put it, the financial status of the "trust fund is substantially improved by the lower expenditures and additional tax revenues instituted by the Affordable Care Act".

The New York Times

As difficult as cutting the deficits will be, much of the reduction by the end of his term will simply reflect an end to spending from the two-year stimulus package and — assuming the economy recovers — higher tax revenues and lower expenditures for safety-net programs like unemployment compensation.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for conciseness in reports or presentations, use "lower expenditure" to clearly indicate a reduction in spending without ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "lower expenditure" when the intention is to convey the idea of something being of low quality or value. "Lower expenditure" refers specifically to reduced spending, not inherent cheapness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lower expenditure" functions primarily as a noun phrase describing a reduction in the amount of money spent. It modifies a noun, as seen in Ludwig's examples such as "lower expenditure on Arab schools" or "lower expenditure for insured patients".

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

55%

News & Media

28%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "lower expenditure" is a grammatically correct and usable term in written English, referring to a reduction in spending. Ludwig AI confirms this, and our analysis shows it is most frequently found in scientific, news and business contexts. While alternatives like "reduced spending" or "decreased costs" exist, "lower expenditure" offers a concise and clear way to convey this meaning. Remember to use it when specifically discussing reduced spending and not simply to describe something as cheap or low quality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reduce spending

This alternative emphasizes the act of decreasing the amount of money spent.

decrease expenses

This alternative highlights the act of reducing costs or outlays.

cut costs

This is a more direct and action-oriented alternative.

trim budget

This alternative focuses on reducing the allocated funds.

economize

This single word encapsulates the concept of using resources carefully to avoid waste.

streamline operations

This alternative focuses on making processes more efficient to reduce costs.

optimize resource allocation

This focuses on using resources in the most effective way to minimize waste and spending.

tighten belts

This idiomatic expression means to spend less money because there is less available.

control outlays

This suggests managing and limiting the money that is spent.

rationalize spending

This alternative emphasizes making spending more logical and efficient.

FAQs

How can I use "lower expenditure" in a sentence?

You can use "lower expenditure" to describe efforts to reduce spending, such as: "The company implemented new strategies to achieve "lower expenditure" this quarter."

What's a more direct way to say "lower expenditure"?

Alternatives include "reduce spending", "cut costs", or "decrease expenses". The best choice depends on the context.

What's the difference between "lower expenditure" and "cost-effective"?

"Lower expenditure" refers specifically to reduced spending, while "cost-effective" means achieving good results for the amount of money spent. A strategy can have "lower expenditure", but it's only cost-effective if the results are satisfactory for that level of spending.

Is it always good to aim for "lower expenditure"?

While aiming for "lower expenditure" is often desirable, it shouldn't compromise quality or essential services. Sometimes, investing more can lead to better long-term outcomes, even if it means higher initial spending.