lower errors for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lower errors for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the reduction of mistakes or inaccuracies in a specific context, such as data analysis, software development, or quality control. Example: "Our new algorithm aims to lower errors for data entry tasks, improving overall efficiency."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

The new model provided similar or lower errors for the drug-like subsets compared to the consensus models developed with individual OCHEM or Enamine sets.

Journal of Cheminformatics

The computed values show lower errors for the macro-area of centre and south of Italy for the two meteorological models and climatological data.

Geoscience Letters

Considering uncertainty in the satellite inputs and model parameters, we estimate an average model error of between 0.27 and 0.63 for log10-transformed size-fractionated production, with lower errors for the small size class (<2 μm), higher errors for the larger size classes (2 10 μm and >10 μm), and errors generally higher in oligotrophic waters.

Progress in Oceanography

Although the Li et al. model attempts to control for factors that might increase error (such as scanner bias), the errors between the two approaches are comparable (Fig. 1B) with GLAM having slightly higher errors for target concentrations less than 4 pM, but much lower errors for target concentrations >4 pM.

Plosone

Figure  5 shows the mean relative error (calculated as the difference between the measured and the reference volume divided by the reference volume) of the volume estimate for each segmentation technique showing lower errors for the method of Schaefer et al. (−31.9%), the level set method (27.2%), and the FCM-SW method (−5.9%).

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

In these test cases, the new model has between 2 and 10 times lower error for a given grid size.

Journal of Computational Physics

Multiple field-based estimates of shear velocity differed by up to 160%, so the lower error for the 2D model's predictions suggests such models are at least as accurate as field measurement.

Journal of Hydrology

Younger individuals show a higher degree of concordance (lower error) for the entire sample.

Plosone

For different parameter sets, we obtained lower errors only for extremely connected networks inferred with high β values and so with a high weight on error in BP-optimization (e.g., β = 5, λ = 5, κ = 5, SSE = 3.8, #edges = 252).

eLife

If the CPU cost is taken as fixed, that is run times are equal for both numerical methods, then PLMDE uniformly produces lower errors than WENO for the fixed computation cost on the test problems considered here.

Journal of Computational Physics

For example, RF showed a lower error rate for D5, C6, C 6, E6, and G6 for SF, while SVM performed better for C5, D5, C6, C 6, and E6 for MFCCs.

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to achieve "lower errors for" a specific task or process, clearly define the metrics used to measure errors. This ensures consistent evaluation and targeted improvement efforts.

Common error

Avoid stating that you want "lower errors for" everything. Instead, focus on specific areas where error reduction will have the most significant impact. Vague statements can lead to unfocused efforts and minimal improvement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lower errors for" functions as a descriptive phrase, often acting as a modifier to specify the purpose or result of an action or a feature. It indicates the intention to reduce mistakes or inaccuracies in a specific context. Ludwig AI indicates that this is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "lower errors for" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase that is found primarily in scientific contexts. Ludwig AI validates this. Its primary function is to describe actions or features designed to reduce mistakes in specific processes. It's typically used to highlight improvements in accuracy and reliability. When using this phrase, it is best to be specific about the area where error reduction is targeted.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reduced errors in

Focuses on the action of reduction and specifies the area where errors are minimized.

decreased mistakes regarding

Uses "mistakes" instead of "errors" and specifies what the mistakes pertain to with "regarding".

minimized inaccuracies within

Replaces "errors" with "inaccuracies" and uses "within" to indicate the scope.

improved accuracy concerning

Shifts the focus to "accuracy" instead of "errors" and uses "concerning" to relate it to a topic.

lessened faults related to

Uses "faults" as a synonym for "errors" and "related to" to specify the association.

mitigated defects affecting

Replaces "errors" with "defects" and uses "affecting" to describe the impact.

curtailed blunders involving

Uses "blunders" which implies more significant errors, and "involving" to show connection.

rectified inaccuracies in

Implies correction of errors and specifies a scope.

reduced the incidence of errors in

Focuses on reducing how often errors occur.

alleviated problems with

Uses "problems" as a broader term for errors and "with" to connect it to a context.

FAQs

How can I use "lower errors for" in a sentence?

You can use "lower errors for" to describe improvements or modifications that reduce the number of mistakes or inaccuracies in a particular process or task. For example, "The new software update aims to "lower errors for" data entry."

What's a formal alternative to "lower errors for"?

A more formal alternative to "lower errors for" is "reduce inaccuracies regarding". This phrasing is suitable for professional or academic contexts.

Is it better to say "lower errors for" or "reduce errors in"?

Both "lower errors for" and "reduce errors in" are grammatically correct. The choice depends on the specific context. "Reduce errors in" may sound more natural in certain situations, while ""lower errors for"" might be preferable in others.

What does it mean to "lower errors for" a certain process?

To ""lower errors for"" a process means to implement strategies or changes that decrease the frequency or severity of mistakes made during that process. This can lead to improved efficiency, reliability, and overall quality.