lower costs

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lower costs" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to express a decrease or reduction in expenses or costs (financial or otherwise). For example: Investing in energy efficient lighting can lower costs for businesses.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

And lower costs.

The New York Times

Others estimate much lower costs.

The New York Times

due to lower costs.

Cornell University

The reason: lower costs.

The New York Times

It requires fewer people, and lower costs.

The New Yorker

The answer is lower costs.

The Guardian - Business

"Truly lower costs impress us.

The New York Times

This should lower costs for chemical producers.

The New York Times

Better outcomes for lower costs.

The Washington Post

Colombia offers distinct advantages besides lower costs.

The New York Times

« Do Health Savings Accounts Lower Costs?

University of California, Berkeley

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to "lower costs", prioritize identifying the largest areas of expenditure first. A small reduction in a major cost driver yields greater savings than a large reduction in a minor one.

Common error

Avoid "lowering costs" by sacrificing quality or essential services. Focus instead on efficiency improvements and strategic resource allocation to maintain standards while reducing expenses.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lower costs" functions primarily as a noun phrase acting as the object of a verb (e.g., "to lower costs"). It indicates the action of reducing expenses. Ludwig provides numerous examples where the phrase is used in this context.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Formal & Business

25%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Science

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "lower costs" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression that signifies a reduction in expenses. As Ludwig highlights, it appears across diverse sources, including news media, academic research, and business publications. While semantically similar phrases like "reduce expenditures" or "cut expenses" exist, "lower costs" provides a generally applicable and easily understood way to communicate the goal of decreasing expenditure. Remember to focus on strategic improvements rather than just cutting corners. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is commonly used and understood.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reduce expenditures

Focuses specifically on reducing the amount of money spent.

cut expenses

Implies a more forceful or immediate reduction in spending.

decrease outlays

A more formal term for reducing the amount of money spent.

economize

Suggests careful management to avoid wasting money.

trim budgets

Specifically refers to reducing the amount of money allocated in a budget.

bring down prices

Focuses on reducing the price of goods or services.

make more affordable

Highlights the increased accessibility due to reduced price.

optimize spending

Focuses on making spending more efficient, potentially leading to lower costs.

streamline operations

Refers to improving processes to reduce waste and, consequently, costs.

improve cost-effectiveness

Highlights the enhancement of value in relation to cost.

FAQs

How can I use "lower costs" in a sentence?

You can use "lower costs" in sentences like: "The company implemented new strategies to "lower costs"", or "Investing in renewable energy can "lower costs" in the long run".

What are some alternatives to saying "lower costs"?

Instead of "lower costs", you could say "reduce expenditures", "cut expenses", or "decrease outlays" depending on the context.

Is it better to "lower costs" or "reduce costs"?

"Lower costs" and "reduce costs" are often interchangeable. However, "reduce costs" might sound slightly more formal in some contexts.

What's the difference between "lowering costs" and "cutting costs"?

"Lowering costs" and "cutting costs" both refer to reducing expenses. "Cutting costs" often implies a more drastic or immediate reduction.