low status for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "low status for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or condition where something or someone is regarded as having a lesser importance or value in a particular context. Example: "The study revealed that there is a low status for mental health issues in many communities, leading to inadequate support and resources."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Will you define "low status" for me?

Vice

Low status for women bodes ill for their well-being and that of their children.

Unicef

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Opposing values such as care, compassion and collectivity are typically derided and afforded low status (compare, for instance, the wages of nurses to city traders).

The Guardian - Opinion

As computers got smarter, working with them stopped being low status work for women and began to be seen as the men's domain.

BBC

Specifically, we propose that inequality and conflict between social groups at the societal level will produce what we call asymmetric intergroup bullying: bullying that is targeted disproportionately (i.e. asymmetrically) towards members of a low status social group, for the purpose of enhancing that group's subordination in society at large.

Human Relations

For both genotypes, there was a main effect of social status of the stimulus monkey, regardless of genotype: both S/L and L/L monkeys looked in the eye region of high-status faces significantly less than that of low-status faces (12.3±8.2% for high status images versus 16.4±9.5% for low status images; Repeated measures ANOVA, F = 20.45, df = 1, p = 0.011).

Plosone

The Code has been blamed for stunting the growth of American comics and maintaining its low status in American society for much of the remainder of the century.

Wikipedia

In contrast, compared to internal block funding, competitive project funding has a negative relation to novelty for low status scientists (especially junior and female researchers).

Research Policy

The equivalent measures for low status faces and perinea were not significantly different between genotypes (p = 0.21 and p = 0.15, respectively).

Plosone

No main effect of interactions for whether the target was seated or standing were observed (ps>.10), but a main effect of gender was found (p<.001) as well as a pose×gender interaction (p<.01), such that the difference in width between men and women was greater for low status and neutral than high status poses.

Plosone

A low status isn't just bad for your social life, it's also bad for your immune system, raising your risk of infection and disease.

Science Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "low status for", ensure the context clearly defines what the low status is in relation to. For example, "low status for women in society" provides a clearer understanding than just "low status".

Common error

Avoid using "low status for" without specifying the relevant group or area. Saying something has a "low status" without context can be vague and confusing for the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "low status for" functions as a descriptive phrase, typically used to indicate that something or someone is considered to have a lower level of importance, value, or social standing within a specific context. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "low status for" is a grammatically correct descriptive phrase used to indicate a position of lesser importance or value. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability. It commonly appears in scientific, news, and business contexts, often highlighting disparities or inequalities. When using this phrase, it's important to provide clear context to avoid vagueness. Related phrases include "inferior standing of" and "lesser importance of", offering alternative ways to express similar concepts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

inferior standing of

Replaces "low status" with "inferior standing", focusing on the relative position.

subordinate position of

Emphasizes the hierarchical aspect of "low status", indicating a lower rank.

disadvantaged situation of

Highlights the negative implications associated with having a "low status".

poor regard for

Focuses on the lack of respect or importance given to something or someone.

lesser importance of

Directly states that something is not as important as other things.

lower value placed on

Highlights that a reduced value is attributed.

marginalized position of

Indicates that a group or individual is pushed to the fringes of society.

demeaned state of

Emphasizes the act of belittling or degrading someone's status.

undervalued role of

Highlights the fact that a person's or thing's function is not fully appreciated.

diminished significance of

Focuses on the reduction in importance or relevance.

FAQs

How can I use "low status for" in a sentence?

You can use "low status for" to describe something considered unimportant or inferior. For example, "There's a "low status for" manual labor in some tech-driven societies".

What's a good alternative to "low status for"?

Alternatives include "inferior standing of", "subordinate position of", or "lesser importance of" depending on the specific context.

Is "low status for" grammatically correct?

Yes, "low status for" is grammatically correct. It's used to indicate something or someone holds a position of lesser value or importance in a particular context.

How does "low status for" differ from "high status for"?

"Low status for" indicates inferiority or less importance, while "high status for" suggests superiority or greater importance. They are opposite ends of a spectrum.