low quantification

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "low quantification" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to measurement, data analysis, or statistics where a small amount or degree of quantification is being discussed. Example: "The study revealed a low quantification of the variables involved, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

The assay is rapid for specimen concentrations ≥1 mg/l and is easily tuned to achieve low quantification limits at high chromatographic resolution for lower concentrated samples.

Journal of Chromatography B

To achieve this goal, a reliable and fast molecular method with high sample throughput and a low quantification limit is desirable.

Plosone

All individual gene profiles discussed in this manuscript have low quantification p-values (≤0.05) and/or additional confidence from similar profiles from functionally grouped genes.

Plosone

The low quantification efficiency of the proteins from the brain analysis suggests that a 15N liver peptide for the corresponding 14N brain peptide was absent or below the limit of detection of the mass spectrometer.

Plosone

This might be due to low quantification capacities of the studied population especially in this respective food group and especially during the 24-h recall.

European Journal of Nutrition

This protein, in spite of having been evaluated in CP, is a constitutive protein with low quantification values and therefore is not a promising biomarker candidate.

BioMed Research International

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

To meet the need for ultra-low quantification limits for PAHs, techniques commonly applied to trace residue analysis in regulated industries such as food and environment must be applied.

Chemistry Central Journal

The lowest quantification limits were from 0.002 to 0.6 μg/L for 1.0 mL of saliva.

Chemistry Central Journal

Combustion IRMS and ferrographic enumeration had the lowest quantification limits (∼2 to 20 cells/ml), whereas microplate spectrofluorometry had the highest quantification limit (∼105 cells/ml).

Journal of Microbiological Methods

Preliminary bioassays revealed that some fractions showed low protein quantification and no antibacterial activity.

AMB Express

Vial activities >400 MBq had very low relative quantification errors (mean +0.29%, median +0.72%, 95%CI-3.30%to to +3.87%), whereas vial activities <400 MBq had larger errors (mean +4.35%, median +4.95%, 95%CI-8.43%3% to +17.12%; Additional file 1: Figure S2) - a finding attributable to background noise from 176Lu within the LYSO crystal [31, 32].

EJNMMI Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing analytical methods, clearly state the specific limits of quantification to provide context for the "low quantification" observed. For example, mention the lowest limit of quantification.

Common error

Don't use "low quantification" without providing specific details about the measurement scale or the expected range. This lack of context can render the statement meaningless.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "low quantification" functions as a noun phrase, where the adjective "low" modifies the noun "quantification". It describes a state or condition characterized by a small amount or degree of measurement. Ludwig confirms the correct usage.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "low quantification" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression, particularly within scientific and academic fields. As Ludwig AI confirms, it effectively conveys the idea of measurement or quantification being limited or minimal. While semantically valid, it is crucial to avoid vagueness and provide specific context when using this phrase. Alternative expressions such as "minimal quantification" or "limited quantification" may offer more precise nuances depending on the specific context. Overall, "low quantification" serves as a valuable term for describing the limitations and challenges associated with measuring small quantities or magnitudes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

minimal quantification

Replaces "low" with "minimal", emphasizing the extremely small amount quantified.

limited quantification

Replaces "low" with "limited", suggesting a restriction in the ability to quantify.

poor quantification

Focuses on the quality of the quantification being substandard or unreliable.

inadequate quantification

Indicates that the quantification is insufficient for the intended purpose.

reduced quantification

Highlights a decrease or lessening in the amount of quantification performed.

insufficient measurement

Shifts focus from quantification to the act of measuring, highlighting its inadequacy.

scarce measurement

Highlights measurement being rare or thinly scattered.

negligible quantification

Indicates the quantification is so small it can be disregarded.

trace quantification

Emphasizes that the quantification is only of trace amounts.

rudimentary quantification

Implies the quantification methods or results are basic or underdeveloped.

FAQs

How is "low quantification" typically used in scientific writing?

In scientific contexts, "low quantification" often indicates that the amount of a substance or the magnitude of a phenomenon is too small to be accurately measured using a particular method. It implies that the results are at or near the detection limit of the instrument or technique.

What are some situations where I might encounter "low quantification"?

You might encounter "low quantification" in fields like analytical chemistry (when measuring trace contaminants), molecular biology (when assessing gene expression levels), or environmental science (when quantifying pollutants in water or soil).

Which is more appropriate: "low quantification" or /s/minimal+quantification?

Both "low quantification" and "minimal quantification" are acceptable, but the choice depends on the nuance you want to convey. "Low" suggests a generally small quantity, while "minimal" implies the smallest possible or barely sufficient quantity.

What's the difference between "low quantification" and stating that a value is "below the detection limit"?

Saying a value is "below the detection limit" means it's undetectable by the method used. "Low quantification" suggests the value is detectable, but near the limit where accurate quantification becomes difficult or unreliable. It sits above undetectable but is still a problematic value to measure.