low priority for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "low priority for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something is not considered urgent or important in a given context. Example: "The project has been assigned a low priority for this quarter, so we will focus on other tasks first."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A low priority for ministers".

The Guardian

"It was a low priority for her".

The New York Times

First, climate change seems tailor-made to be a low priority for most people.

The Guardian

But leak investigations were a low priority for the Justice Department and the F.B.I.

The New York Times

But it does mean that such cases are a low priority for government prosecutors.

The Washington Post

A decade ago, Russia was a low priority for American foreign policy.

University of California, Berkeley

Nonmatriculated students may apply for housing but have a low priority for assignment.

Stanford University

Visiting researchers may apply for housing, but have a low priority for assignments.

Stanford University

But Mr. Baine said that a small network is a low priority for cable operators.

The New York Times

Sports have been a low priority for a country that has critical public health concerns.

The New York Times - Sports

The lapse dictated a low priority for stabilization projects in Libya itself.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the audience when using "low priority for". In formal settings, provide a brief justification to avoid seeming dismissive or uncaring.

Common error

Avoid assuming your audience understands why something is a "low priority for" someone or something. Briefly explain the rationale to prevent misunderstandings or negative perceptions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "low priority for" primarily functions as an adjective phrase followed by a preposition, modifying a noun (often implied) to indicate its relative importance. Ludwig AI validates this usage, showing it's a standard way to express that something is not considered urgent or significant.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

20%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Science

10%

Reference

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "low priority for" is a common and grammatically sound expression used to indicate that something is not considered urgent or important. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use across diverse contexts, including news, academia, and business. When using this phrase, it's crucial to provide context and explain the reasons behind the low priority to avoid misunderstandings. Alternatives like "not a high concern for" or "of minor importance to" can offer similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis. By following best practices and avoiding common errors, you can effectively communicate the relative importance of different tasks or issues.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not a high concern for

Replaces 'priority' with 'concern', emphasizing a lack of worry or attention.

of minor importance to

Uses 'importance' instead of 'priority', focusing on the significance or value placed on something.

secondary to

Indicates that something is less important than something else, implying a ranking.

not a key focus for

Replaces 'priority' with 'focus', highlighting a lack of concentration or attention.

not a major issue for

Substitutes 'priority' with 'issue', suggesting it is not a significant problem.

given little weight by

Emphasizes the lack of importance assigned to something, using the metaphor of weight.

de-emphasized for

Highlights that something has been intentionally made less prominent or important.

low on the agenda for

Uses 'agenda' to convey that something is not a pressing matter to be addressed.

not at the forefront for

Indicates that something is not in the leading position or at the center of attention.

relegated for

Suggests that something has been moved to a lower or less important position.

FAQs

How can I use "low priority for" in a sentence?

You can use "low priority for" to indicate something isn't considered urgent or important. For example, "That task is a "low priority for" the team this quarter."

What's a more formal way to say "low priority for"?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "of minor importance to" or "secondary to". These alternatives provide a similar meaning while maintaining a professional register.

What can I say instead of "low priority for" to emphasize something is being ignored?

To emphasize neglect, you might use phrases like "given little weight by" or "de-emphasized for". These alternatives highlight that something is not receiving the attention it might deserve.

Is it correct to say something is "a low priority to" someone?

While understandable, it's more common and grammatically sound to say something is "a "low priority for"" someone. The preposition "for" is typically used to indicate who is assigning the priority.