low overhead

USAGE SUMMARY

"low overhead" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to a company or organization whose operating costs are not high, usually resulting in higher profits. For example, "Many companies have been able to become successful due in part to their low overhead."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Low overhead.

The New York Times - Arts

A helicopter circled low overhead.

Independent

The low overhead helps.

The New York Times

Helicopters circled low overhead.

The New York Times

One answer is low overhead.

The New York Times

The planes fly low overhead and fire their machine guns.

The Guardian - Books

"The secret to happiness is low overhead," Mr. Frank jokes.

The New York Times

In their favor, most of these labels have low overhead.

The New York Times

"These can be very lean companies with low overhead".

The New York Times

If you have low overhead, you have a show".

The New York Times

Solution 2 (Low Overhead): Split the presentation into digestible chunks.

Stanford University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing business strategy, use "low overhead" to highlight a competitive advantage. For instance, "Our company's success is largely attributable to our low overhead, which allows us to offer competitive pricing."

Common error

Don't assume "low overhead" always equates to positive outcomes. While it can increase profitability, excessively cutting costs might compromise product quality or customer service. Always strike a balance between cost efficiency and maintaining standards.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "low overhead" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often used as a subject or object in a sentence. It describes a state or condition of having minimal operating expenses. According to Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Formal & Business

20%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Science

10%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "low overhead" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe minimal operating expenses, often in a business context. Ludwig's AI confirms its correctness and widespread use. While generally positive, remember that excessively focusing on "low overhead" can have drawbacks if it compromises quality. Use it to highlight efficiency, but be mindful of the broader implications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

minimal operating costs

Focuses on the costs associated with running a business.

reduced expenses

Highlights the decrease in spending.

lean operation

Emphasizes efficiency and minimizing waste.

cost-effective structure

Highlights the efficiency in terms of cost.

economical infrastructure

Focuses on the financial efficiency of the underlying systems.

shoestring budget

Indicates operating with very limited funds.

tight fiscal policy

Refers to strict control over spending.

streamlined processes

Focuses on simplifying operations to reduce costs.

efficient resource allocation

Highlights the effective use of available resources.

cost minimization

Emphasizes the efforts to reduce expenses.

FAQs

How can I use "low overhead" in a sentence?

You can say, "The company's success is due to its ability to maintain a "low overhead"" or "A "low overhead" allows the business to be more competitive".

What are some synonyms for "low overhead"?

Alternatives include "minimal operating costs", "reduced expenses", or "lean operation" depending on the specific context.

Is it always good to have "low overhead"?

While generally beneficial, excessively focusing on "low overhead" can sometimes lead to cutting corners on quality or service. It's important to strike a balance.

What is the difference between "low overhead" and "cost-effective"?

"Low overhead" specifically refers to reduced operating expenses, while "cost-effective" is a broader term meaning good value for the money spent. Something can be "cost-effective" without necessarily having "low overhead".