low levels

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "low levels" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a small quantity or degree of something, often in scientific, medical, or general contexts. Example: "The study found that participants exhibited low levels of anxiety after the intervention."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Low levels of M.T.B.E.

The New York Times

Too much Confucianism, low levels of literacy.

The New York Times

Sometimes, it contains low levels of radiation.

The New York Times

But consumer confidence remained at low levels.

The New York Times

The first is low levels of giving.

The Guardian

It also reflected low levels of unionisation.

The Guardian

Inventories have dipped to historically low levels.

The New York Times

They aspire to low levels of success.

The Guardian

Violence continued today, but at relatively low levels.

The New York Times

"We're talking about low levels of radioactive solutions," he said.

The New York Times

"There are too many people on the low levels.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing scientific or medical results, clearly specify the units of measurement associated with the "low levels" to provide context and prevent misinterpretation. For example, instead of saying "low levels of vitamin D", say "low levels of vitamin D (below 20 ng/mL)".

Common error

Don't just state "low levels" without indicating what the levels are low compared to. Always provide a reference point, such as "low levels compared to the average" or "lower than the recommended threshold".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "low levels" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often used as the object of a verb or preposition. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatical and widely used. It typically modifies an implied or stated noun, indicating a reduced quantity or degree.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "low levels" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to describe a small quantity or degree of something. Ludwig AI confirms its widespread usage across various contexts, particularly in news, media, and scientific domains. When using "low levels", ensure clarity by specifying the units of measurement and providing a reference point for comparison. Alternatives include "minimal amounts" or "reduced quantities". Remember to avoid vague comparisons and always indicate what the levels are low compared to. By following these guidelines, you can effectively communicate the concept of reduced quantities with precision and clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

minimal amounts

Emphasizes the small quantity of something.

reduced quantities

Focuses on the decrease in the amount of something.

small quantities

Highlights the limited size of amounts.

insufficient amounts

Indicates that the quantity is not enough for a specific purpose.

diminished levels

Stresses that the levels have decreased from a previous state.

meager quantities

Suggests that the amounts are scarce or inadequate.

trace amounts

Implies the presence of something in extremely small quantities.

negligible quantities

Emphasizes that the amounts are so small they can be ignored.

reduced concentrations

Focuses on the lessening of the amount of a substance within a specific volume.

depleted levels

Indicates a significant reduction or exhaustion of the amount.

FAQs

How can I use "low levels" in a sentence?

You can use "low levels" to describe a small quantity or degree of something. For instance, "The study found "low levels" of anxiety after the intervention" or "The patient had "low levels" of vitamin D".

What are some alternatives to "low levels"?

Some alternatives to "low levels" include "minimal amounts", "reduced quantities", or "small quantities", depending on the specific context.

Is it always bad to have "low levels" of something?

Not necessarily. While "low levels" can indicate a deficiency or problem (e.g., "low levels" of vitamin D), it can also be desirable in certain contexts (e.g., "low levels" of crime or pollution).

What does it mean when a report says something is present in "trace amounts"?

When a report mentions "trace amounts", it indicates that a substance is present, but only in very small, often barely detectable, quantities. This is similar to saying there are "low levels" of that substance.