Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
low importance for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "low importance for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is not considered significant or is of minor relevance in a particular context. Example: "In this analysis, we will assign low importance for factors that do not significantly impact the overall outcome."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
8 human-written examples
Wollaston said the NHS had given mental healthcare low importance for decades.
News & Media
For 2015 low importance for EU decision makers and transport industry managers was assumed (see Table 12, Annex).
A moderate importance of colluvial soils is determined for the LU plot (12% of SOC stock), and a low importance for the CM plot (5% of SOC stock).
Science
In panel C we can see the connectivity degree distribution that now resembles a power law distribution (too few nodes, however to have a reliable statistic for the fit) indicating a relatively high importance of few nodes and a low importance for most nodes.
Nevertheless, the prevalent assumption that red light is of low importance for reef fish[ 5] must be questioned.
Science
The evolutionarily conserved T31 plays a pivotal role in the inhibition of cruzipain, while it is of relatively low importance for the inhibition of cathepsin L (Table 2).
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
51 human-written examples
Our findings suggest that the teachers' perceptions about the low importance of education on ageing matters for the professional practice of health sciences could be a negative factor for gerontology teaching.
Science
Our findings suggest that the teachers' perceptions about the low importance of education on ageing matters for the professional practice of health sciences could be a negative factor for gerontology teaching in undergraduate students of health sciences of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (at ZARAGOZA Campus).
Science
This might explain the responders" high-perceived importance for program development and teaching experience, but does not explain the low importance of research education.
Science
However, betweenness centrality and the SigFlux measure give low importance values for these inhibitory nodes, which contradict immunological knowledge.
Science
In their study, a detailed analysis of breaths with similar MDT but variable distribution between TI and TP led to the suggestion that time for alveolar perfusion during inspiration is of low importance compared with time for distribution and diffusion within the alveolar zone, as expressed by MDT.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "low importance for", ensure the context clearly defines what it is less important compared to. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid assuming that "low importance for" means something is entirely unnecessary or can be ignored. It simply means it's less critical than other factors, but it still might require some attention.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "low importance for" functions as a qualifier, typically modifying a noun or concept to indicate its diminished significance or relevance in relation to something else. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
Science
75%
News & Media
25%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "low importance for" is used to express that something is not considered particularly significant or crucial in a given context. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and acceptable. Although appearing less frequently than other similar phrases, its presence in scientific and news media suggests a solid basis in formal communication. Some alternatives include "minor significance for" and "little relevance to". When using the phrase, remember to define the context for clarity and avoid assuming complete dismissal of the item being described as less important.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
minor significance for
Replaces "low importance" with a synonym, maintaining the preposition "for".
little relevance to
Shifts from "importance" to "relevance" and changes the preposition to "to".
not a priority for
Expresses that something is not a main concern or focus.
of secondary importance to
Indicates something is less important compared to other things.
less crucial for
Replaces "importance" with "crucial" and adds "less" to diminish the degree.
subordinate to
Implies that something is under the importance of another.
of limited consequence for
Suggests that something has a small effect.
not essential for
Indicates that something is not absolutely necessary.
holds minimal weight for
Emphasizes the small degree of importance.
peripheral to
Expresses the idea that something is tangential or not central.
FAQs
How can I use "low importance for" in a sentence?
You can use "low importance for" to indicate that something is not a priority or is less significant than other factors. For example, "Accessibility was ranked as of "low importance for" PCC".
What can I say instead of "low importance for"?
You can use alternatives like "minor significance for", "little relevance to", or "not a priority for" depending on the context.
Is it better to say "low importance for" or "less important for"?
Both "low importance for" and "less important for" are grammatically correct. "Low importance for" is a more direct statement, while "less important for" implies a comparison with something else. The better choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.
What's the difference between "low importance for" and "of low importance to"?
"Low importance for" emphasizes the lack of significance regarding a particular aspect or purpose. "Of low importance to" focuses on the lack of significance from a specific perspective or entity. The choice depends on whether you want to stress the purpose or the affected party.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested