low feasibility

USAGE SUMMARY

'low feasibility' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to an option or decision that has a low chance of success or being successful in the long-term. For example, "The project was rejected due to its low feasibility."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

And Zakharchenko seemed undeterred by the low feasibility of his plan.

The Washington Post

In the past year, a handful of countries that have taken Chinese investments have reconsidered BRI deals amid allegations of corruption and low feasibility.

The Washington Post

In particular, we will discuss how the low feasibility of conducting an adequately powered clinical trial of DAA use for PEP and the low cost-effectiveness of such an intervention is not supportive of targeting limited resources for such use.

Duke University

The cluster of drivers with low feasibility and low desirability is called Potential Jolts, and the cluster of drivers with high feasibility and high desirability is called Significant Impactors.

European Journal of Futures Research

Puig et al. discuss the reasons for the low feasibility rate of ASO RQ-PCR in MM.

Blood Cancer Journal

Given the low feasibility of intervention studies, carefully designed longitudinal and cross-sectional observational studies could make very useful contributions to this field.

European Journal of Public Health

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

This suggests that the 3ycomp husk has the lowest feasibility as a K source.

International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

Thus, although marginal costs may be low, the feasibility of eliminating meat production to decrease the TP loading appears to be low nonetheless when reliable alternatives such as improving sewage treatment or phosphate bans are readily at hand.

Plosone

Tube-and-mask resuscitation was rated very low for feasibility, even lower than mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

Health Research Policy and Systems

However, this would not only be time consuming but also low in feasibility because it requires that the first step creates a knock-out allele that would unfortunately generate the lin-28 lf) lin-28 lf.

eLife

Among the CRC screening approaches in people at average risk (persons aged 50 74 years), annual or biennial FOBT followed by colonoscopy triage of screen-positive individuals is the most widely used strategy due to its low cost, feasibility, safety and non-invasiveness.

BMJ Open

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing projects or proposals, use "low feasibility" to clearly communicate doubts about the likelihood of success or efficient execution. This helps stakeholders understand potential risks and challenges upfront.

Common error

Avoid using "low feasibility" when the issue is not about the possibility of success but rather the desirability or ethical implications. Feasibility specifically addresses whether something can be done, not whether it should be done.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "low feasibility" primarily functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun. It describes the extent to which a plan, project, or idea is realistically possible or likely to succeed. As Ludwig AI explains, it indicates a reduced probability of something being successfully implemented.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "low feasibility" is a grammatically sound and professionally appropriate phrase used to describe projects, plans, or ideas that are unlikely to succeed. As Ludwig AI confirms, its directness helps communicate concerns about practicality and viability. Although less frequent than some synonyms, it is common enough to be easily understood across diverse professional fields. When writing, remember to prioritize it over alternatives such as "poor feasibility", and avoid using it when the issue relates to ethical or desirability aspects.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

limited practicality

Focuses on the practical aspects rather than the overall possibility of success.

reduced likelihood of success

Shifts the emphasis to the probability of achieving a positive outcome.

minimal chance of realization

Highlights the slim prospect of something becoming a reality.

unlikely to be viable

Emphasizes the lack of sustainability or long-term workability.

poor prospect of implementation

Focuses on the challenges associated with putting a plan into action.

questionable achievability

Casts doubt on whether something can realistically be accomplished.

dubious potential for success

Highlights the uncertainty and skepticism surrounding a project's outcome.

slim possibility of materialization

Emphasizes the remote chance of something becoming tangible or concrete.

unpromising outlook

Describes a situation where the prospects for a positive result are unfavorable.

impracticality

Simply focuses on describing something as not practical or realistic.

FAQs

How can I use "low feasibility" in a sentence?

You can use "low feasibility" to describe projects, plans, or ideas that are unlikely to succeed or be implemented effectively. For example, "The proposal was rejected due to its "low feasibility"".

What are some alternatives to "low feasibility"?

Alternatives include phrases like "limited practicality", "reduced likelihood of success", or "unlikely to be viable", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "low feasibility" or "poor feasibility"?

"Low feasibility" and "poor feasibility" are often interchangeable, but "low feasibility" is generally more common and neutral. "Poor feasibility" might imply a more critical assessment of the situation.

What does "low feasibility" imply about a project?

It suggests that the project faces significant challenges, making its successful completion unlikely without substantial modifications or unforeseen favorable circumstances. It may also indicate that the resources required are disproportionate to the potential benefits.