low evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

"low evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are discussing evidence that is not concrete, such as in a court of law, or is broken up or not complete. Example sentence: The detectives had very low evidence to support their case, so they were unable to make an arrest.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Long-term interest rates remain historically low — evidence that global investors remain confident in the government's creditworthiness.

The New York Times

Despite a low evidence level in terms of study design, there were no major concerns about risk of bias.

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

The relevance of this research question arises from the low evidence related to the amount of costs before the diagnosis compared to after the diagnosis.

Health Economics Review

Given that prophylactic irradiation therapy has a low evidence level and has not been established, we suggested the patient undergo radiation therapy, but he refused.

Surgical Case Reports

In spite of this low evidence level, verapamil is generally considered to be the mainstay of CH preventive therapy as in the European guidelines [3].

The Journal of Headache and Pain

There is low evidence that fresh blastocyst transfer is associated with improved live-birth rates compared with fresh cleavage-stage embryos.

Fertility and Sterility

According to the therapy-related hierarchy of scientific evidence 〈http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025〉, however, such publications are associated with a very low evidence level.

European Journal of Integrative Medicine

Despite a low evidence level in terms of study design, there were no major concerns about risk of bias; 13/22 studies were rated with a low risk of bias, 9/22 had a medium risk.

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Recent guidelines on nutritional support for critically ill patients by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition indicate very low evidence for routine supplementation of antioxidants summarizing studies until 2013 [26].

Annals of Intensive Care

According to this systematic review, it appears that there is a low evidence showing a significant advantage of the minimally invasive surgical procedures relative to the possible associated adverse effects.

Progress in Orthodontics

They found low evidence or no effect or insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about meditation and attention, substance use, eating habits, sleep and weight.

Los Angeles Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Quantify how "low" the evidence actually is. For example, mention sample sizes or study limitations that contribute to the low evidence rating.

Common error

Do not automatically assume that "low evidence" implies that an effect or relationship does not exist. It simply means that current data is insufficient to draw firm conclusions. Further research may still reveal a significant effect.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "low evidence" functions as an adjective-noun combination, modifying a noun (often related to claims, theories, or treatments) to indicate a lack of robust supporting data. Ludwig AI explains that "low evidence" is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

88%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "low evidence" is commonly used to indicate a lack of strong support for a claim, theory, or treatment, particularly in scientific and news contexts. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's grammatical correctness. While it is often used formally, especially in science, it's essential not to equate "low evidence" with a lack of effect; further research may be necessary. Alternatives include "limited evidence" and "weak evidence". When using "low evidence", be specific about the type of evidence lacking and avoid automatically dismissing potential effects.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

insufficient evidence

States that the existing evidence is not enough to draw a conclusion or support a claim.

limited evidence

Focuses on the restricted scope or amount of evidence.

weak evidence

Highlights the poor quality or unconvincing nature of the evidence.

scant evidence

Indicates a very small amount of evidence available.

unconvincing evidence

Highlights that the evidence, even if present, fails to persuade or prove a point.

sparse evidence

Similar to scant, but can also imply the evidence is scattered and incomplete.

modest evidence

Emphasizes the limited amount of evidence, suggesting it's present but not substantial.

meager evidence

Suggests the evidence is not only small in quantity but also poor in quality.

tenuous evidence

Implies the evidence is fragile and easily challenged.

negligible evidence

Highlights the lack of importance of the evidence.

FAQs

How do I use "low evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "low evidence" to describe situations where there's a lack of strong support for a claim, theory, or treatment. For instance, "There is "low evidence" to support the use of this drug for that particular condition.".

What are some alternatives to saying "low evidence"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "limited evidence", "weak evidence", or "insufficient evidence".

Is it appropriate to use "low evidence" in formal writing?

Yes, "low evidence" is suitable for formal writing, especially in scientific and academic contexts when discussing the strength of research findings. However, ensure that your usage is precise and reflects the actual state of available data.

What does it mean when a study concludes there is "low evidence" for something?

It signifies that the available data from studies is not strong enough to confidently support a particular conclusion. This could be due to small sample sizes, methodological limitations, or conflicting results. It does not necessarily mean the conclusion is false, just that more research is needed.