low efficient

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "low efficient" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct term is "low efficiency" or "inefficient." Example: "The machine operates at a low efficiency, leading to increased operational costs."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

32 human-written examples

Compared to EMAS, which are often equipped with low efficient load holding mechanisms, EHAs can also offer superior energy efficiency.

Procedia Engineering

The existing methods are still low efficient for revealing alginate lyase-excreting microbes at large scale.

AMB Express

For example, the low efficient usage of system service in iHeartRadio.

Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems

Currently, relatively low efficient boilers are installed in mills to produce steam for sterilization, drying, and power generation.

Energy, Sustainability and Society

Note that SBRs are normally operated with constant predefined duration of the stages, thus, resulting in low efficient operation.

Computers & Chemical Engineering

By varying the parameters step-by-step to obtain the optimize values is a time-consuming, low efficient and aimless process, which indicates an infeasible method.

Nano-Micro Letters

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

28 human-written examples

The results show that the most efficient case of the proposed system is providing 89.8% net energy efficiency, which is almost 7.6% higher than the lowest efficient case.

Energy Conversion and Management

Finally, from an acoustic point of view using Curle's acoustic analogy, both the stream-tube contraction and the axial velocity deficit have the same effect: they turn an acoustically-low efficient quadrupole into a strong dipole making these parameters fundamental for future CROR OBVI investigations.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

It is one of the lowest efficient technologies that have been put into application among the present petrochemical domain.

Nanoscale Research Letters

To avoid HPT, the aim should not be normalization of serum phosphate, but the lowest efficient dose that promote growth and heal rickets.

European Journal of Endocrinology

However, careful monitoring of treatment, to ensure lowest efficient phosphate dose is very important to heal rickets and at the same time reduce the risk of tertiary HPT.

European Journal of Endocrinology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the degree to which something exhibits efficiency, use the grammatically correct phrasing "low efficiency" or, for stronger impact, the adjective "inefficient."

Common error

Avoid using the adjective "low" directly with the adjective "efficient". Instead, correctly use "low" to modify the noun "efficiency" or use the single-word adjective "inefficient" to describe the subject. For example, say "the system has low efficiency" or "the system is inefficient", not "the system is low efficient".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "low efficient" functions as an adjective phrase intended to describe something that does not perform with a high level of efficiency. However, according to Ludwig AI, this phrasing is grammatically incorrect. The correct form would be to use "low efficiency" or the adjective "inefficient."

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "low efficient" appears in some contexts, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies the correct phrasing as "low efficiency" or the single-word adjective "inefficient". This issue primarily arises in scientific or technical writing where the intent is to describe something that lacks efficiency. It's crucial to use the accurate phrasing for clarity and grammatical correctness. Related terms include "poorly efficient" or "suboptimal efficiency", depending on the context and the degree of inefficiency you want to express.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

inefficient

Single-word replacement, directly expressing the lack of efficiency.

poorly efficient

Adds emphasis to the low level of efficiency.

low in efficiency

Rephrases to emphasize the characteristic of "efficiency" being low.

not very efficient

Uses a negative construction to express a lack of efficiency.

lacking efficiency

Highlights the absence of efficiency.

suboptimal efficiency

More technical term, suggesting the efficiency is below the ideal level.

with limited efficiency

Expresses the constraint on efficiency.

of reduced efficiency

Formal way to indicate a decrease in efficiency.

less effective

Shifts the focus from efficiency to overall effectiveness.

underperforming

Describes something that is not meeting expectations regarding efficiency or output.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say something isn't very efficient?

The correct way to phrase this is to say something has "low efficiency" or is "inefficient". The phrase "low efficient" is grammatically incorrect.

Is there a difference between "low efficiency" and "inefficient"?

"Low efficiency" is a description of a characteristic, whereas "inefficient" is a direct adjective. Both convey a similar meaning, but "inefficient" can sometimes carry a stronger negative connotation.

When should I use "low efficiency" vs. "poor efficiency"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "poor efficiency" suggests a more severe deficiency than "low efficiency". The choice depends on the degree of inefficiency you wish to convey.

What are some synonyms for "inefficient"?

Synonyms for "inefficient" include "wasteful", "unproductive", and "uneconomical". The best choice depends on the specific context.