low cost of

USAGE SUMMARY

'low cost of' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe something that is inexpensive. For example, "These shoes have a low cost of only twenty dollars."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

He appreciates Berlin's low cost of living and bohemian spirit.

The New York Times

A good rating gives AIG a low cost of funding.

The Economist

The low cost of printable circuits makes inexpensive, disposable electronics possible.

The New York Times - Science

Above all, many more destinations have become accessible due to the low cost of flights.

The Guardian - Travel

Many are retirees attracted by the climate and relative low cost of living.

The New York Times

Thanks to its minimal rents and low cost of living, Berlin has a thriving creative scene.

The New York Times

The low cost of Mr. Espy is not an exception in Washington.

The New Yorker

With a low cost of borrowing, companies found it easier to make profits.

The Guardian - Opinion

German success is nothing to do with the low cost of labour".

The Guardian

Second, the low cost of capital is working in favor of small caps.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

A low cost-of-fit is thus expected to give a good representation of the system.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing costs, be specific about what factors contribute to the "low cost of". Providing context (e.g., "low cost of living", "low cost of production") will enhance clarity.

Common error

Don't assume "low cost of" always equates to the best value. Consider hidden costs, such as maintenance, opportunity costs, or long-term implications that might outweigh the initial savings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "low cost of" functions primarily as a descriptor, modifying a noun to indicate that something has a relatively inexpensive cost. Ludwig examples showcase its use across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Science

24%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Wiki

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "low cost of" is a common and grammatically sound expression used to indicate affordability. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in various contexts. With 67 real-world examples, the analysis reveals its frequent usage in "News & Media" and "Science". When using "low cost of", ensure clarity by specifying what factors contribute to the reduced expense, and always consider potential hidden costs that might affect overall value. Related alternatives include "inexpensive price of" and "affordable rate for".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

inexpensive price of

Replaces 'cost' with 'price' and uses 'inexpensive' to emphasize low price.

reduced price of

Focuses on the fact that the cost has been lowered.

affordable rate for

Substitutes 'cost' with 'rate' and 'low' with 'affordable' implying budget-friendliness.

budget price for

Replaces 'cost' with 'price' and use 'budget' to indicate a focus on thriftiness.

reasonable charge for

Replaces "cost" with "charge", suggesting a fair and acceptable price point.

economical expense of

Uses 'economical' and 'expense' offering a more formal tone.

small fee for

Substitutes "cost" with "fee" to specify a payment, emphasizing the low amount.

minimal expenditure on

Replaces "cost" with the more formal "expenditure" to denote a low financial output.

cut-rate expense of

This phrase emphasizes that the price is unusually low.

cheap outlay for

Uses 'cheap' and 'outlay' indicating a low initial investment.

FAQs

How can I use "low cost of" in a sentence?

You can use "low cost of" to describe something that is inexpensive. For example, "The "low cost of" living in Berlin attracts many expats".

What are some alternatives to "low cost of"?

Alternatives include "inexpensive price of", "affordable rate for", or "economical expense of" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "low cost of" or "low price of"?

While both phrases are similar, "low cost of" is often used in a broader sense, while "low price of" typically refers to a specific item or service. You can use "low price of" when you are talking about goods or services.

What does "low cost of capital" mean?

"Low cost of capital" refers to the inexpensive borrowing rates for companies, often used in financial contexts to indicate favorable conditions for investment and growth.