lots of missing

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lots of missing" is not correct and sounds incomplete in written English.
It may be used in contexts where you are referring to a significant amount of something that is absent or lacking, but it requires additional context to be clear. Example: "There are lots of missing pieces in this puzzle that need to be found."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

12 human-written examples

There's lots of missing money and missing information".

The Guardian

In the short run that means lots of missing girls, which some have termed a "gendercide".

The Economist

"We deal with lots and lots of missing people every day.

The Guardian

Residents can show you lots of missing services: the borough is right now consulting on plans to squeeze the vast majority of libraries to around 540 sq ft, or the size of a Hampstead Garden Suburb living room.

The Guardian - Opinion

In sum, there have been some claims and more rumors about Arrington, as well as counterclaims and most of all, lots of missing information.

TechCrunch

Since the algorithm can handle missing values in a dataset more naturally, the alternating decision tree algorithm can be applied to analyzing our PPI dataset which includes lots of missing values.

Vietnam Journal of Computer Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

48 human-written examples

"There were lots of missed opportunities and times I wanted to shoot but was told not to.

The New Yorker

This second batch of material relies on silly masks and hats to do the heavy lifting, and leaves lots of missed opportunities for more inventive physical comedy.

The New York Times

That's a lot of missing jobs.

The New York Times

That is a lot of missing concrete.

The New York Times

A lot of missing people; and a lot of new ones.

The Guardian - Music

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer the phrase "a lot of missing" as it's more grammatically accepted in formal writing.

Common error

Avoid using "lots of missing" in formal writing. Opt for "a lot of missing" or other alternatives like "many missing" to maintain grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lots of missing" functions as a quantifier followed by an adjective. It attempts to describe the quantity of something that is absent. Ludwig AI indicates that "lots of missing" is not correct and sounds incomplete in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "lots of missing" is used, it's not considered grammatically correct in standard written English. Ludwig suggests that it sounds incomplete and is better replaced with alternatives like "a lot of missing" or "many missing". Its function is to indicate a considerable absence, but its register leans toward the informal. When in doubt, especially in formal or professional writing, opt for the grammatically sounder alternative. The phrase appears in contexts of News & Media and Science.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a lot of missing

Replaces "lots" with the more standard quantifier "a lot", resulting in more grammatically correct sentence.

many missing

Replaces "lots of" with "many", offering a more concise and grammatically standard form.

numerous absences

Transforms the phrase into a noun phrase emphasizing the quantity of absences.

significant omissions

Shifts the focus to the act of omitting, highlighting important missing elements.

considerable deficiencies

Emphasizes the inadequacy and substantial lack of something.

substantial shortage

Highlights the lack of an adequate supply or amount.

marked absence

Emphasizes the noticeable or distinct lack of something.

extensive gaps

Focuses on the presence of large or widespread voids or lacunae.

wide-ranging incompleteness

Indicates that the lack affects various areas or aspects.

pervasive lack

Highlights that the absence is widespread and affects many aspects.

FAQs

Is "lots of missing" grammatically correct?

According to Ludwig AI, the phrase "lots of missing" is not considered grammatically correct in standard written English. It's better to use "a lot of missing".

What can I say instead of "lots of missing"?

You can use alternatives like "a lot of missing", "many missing", or rephrase your sentence to use alternatives such as "significant omissions" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "lots of missing" or "a lot of missing"?

"A lot of missing" is generally considered more grammatically correct than "lots of missing" in formal writing.

How can I use "a lot of missing" in a sentence?

You can use "a lot of missing" in sentences like: "There's a lot of missing information in this report" or "That's a lot of missing concrete".