a lot of missing

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a lot of missing" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate a large quantity or amount of something that is missing or has been lost. For example, "We've inventoried the supplies and noticed a lot of missing items."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

53 human-written examples

That's a lot of missing jobs.

The New York Times

That is a lot of missing concrete.

The New York Times

So, what that really is, there's a lot of missing information here.

Harvard Business Review

Meanwhile, Michigan is doing a lot of missing, including their last seven from 3-point range.

The New York Times - Sports

A lot of missing people; and a lot of new ones.

The Guardian - Music

Even with their immense home-field advantage, and Peyton Manning's passing, those are a lot of missing pieces to overcome.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

7 human-written examples

We had a lot of missed opportunities.

The New York Times - Sports

"You've seen a lot of missed plays.

The New York Times

After all, there were a lot of missed tackles.

The New York Times

Made for a lot of missed notes and noisy squawks.

The Guardian

"There were a lot of missed assignments," Laviolette said.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a lot of missing", ensure the context clearly indicates what is missing. For example, specify "a lot of missing data" instead of just "a lot of missing" for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "a lot of missing" without a clear noun to specify what's missing. Saying something like, "There's a lot of missing", lacks clarity. Instead, specify what is missing to avoid ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a lot of missing" functions as a modifier to indicate a significant quantity or degree of absence. Ludwig AI suggests that it is grammatically correct. Examples from Ludwig show it describing "missing data", "missing information", and "missing texts".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Academia

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "a lot of missing" is a common and grammatically sound way to express a significant absence or deficiency. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability across various contexts. It's most frequently found in News & Media and Scientific sources and serves to emphasize the extent of something that is lacking. For clarity, it's best to specify what is missing (e.g., "a lot of missing data"). While versatile, ensure the context fits, and consider alternatives like "significant amount of absence" for nuanced expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant amount of absence

Emphasizes the notable quantity of something being absent.

considerable lack of

Highlights the substantial deficiency of something.

substantial deficit of

Focuses on the notable shortage or shortfall.

large quantity absent

Directly states that a large quantity is not present.

marked absence of

Underscores that the absence is clearly noticeable.

serious shortage of

Indicates a critical deficiency or lack.

significant void in

Highlights the presence of a substantial emptiness.

extensive gap in

Focuses on the wide-ranging incompleteness or absence.

noticeable omissions

Emphasizes that the missing elements are easily observed.

major insufficiency

Highlights a crucial lack of required resources or elements.

FAQs

How can I use "a lot of missing" in a sentence?

You can use "a lot of missing" to describe a significant absence of something, such as "There is "a lot of missing data" in the report", or "The police found "a lot of missing evidence" at the crime scene."

What are some alternatives to "a lot of missing"?

Some alternatives include phrases like "significant amount of absence", "considerable lack of", or "substantial deficit of", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "a lot of missing" or "many missing"?

While both can work, "a lot of missing" is generally used with uncountable nouns, while "many missing" is used with countable nouns. For example, you'd say "a lot of missing information" but "many missing items".

How does "a lot of missing" compare to "significant number of missing"?

"A lot of missing" is more general and can apply to both countable and uncountable things. "Significant number of missing" is more formal and applies specifically to countable items or people. For example, "a significant number of missing persons".