lost access to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lost access to" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it when referring to the inability to reach or use something, such as information, resources, or accounts. Example: "After the system update, I lost access to my email account." Alternative expressions include "gained no entry to" and "couldn't reach."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Encyclopedias

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

51 human-written examples

It lost access to its former ports soon afterwards.

The Economist

With his suspension, he has lost access to that platform.

The New York Times

But the worst thing about these times was that she lost access to her high.

The New Yorker

At the same time, children's hospitals lost access to discounts on the drugs.

The New York Times - Health

WASHINGTON — LAST week Syrians lost access to the Internet for the second time in a month.

The New York Times

But lawyers representing clients who have lost access to their money do not accept this argument.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

6 human-written examples

Companies could abruptly lose access to funds.

The New York Times

Sinners could lose access to ECB support.

The Economist

Academics are losing access to scientific journals.

The Guardian

Children who are disenrolled can lose access to tribal schools.

The New York Times

"Patients would lose access to care very quickly," Mr. Dombi said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the nuance of "lost access to" versus alternatives. It often implies a previous ability to access something that is now gone, rather than a never-present ability.

Common error

Avoid using "lost access to" when referring to something that was never accessible in the first place. For example, instead of saying "They lost access to the exclusive club", say "They were never granted access to the exclusive club".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lost access to" functions as a verb phrase, specifically a verb in the past tense followed by a noun and a preposition. It indicates a completed action where someone or something no longer has the ability or means to reach or use something. Ludwig AI confirms its validity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

82%

Wiki

10%

Science

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "lost access to" is a grammatically correct and widely used verb phrase that conveys the deprivation or inability to reach or use something. As demonstrated by Ludwig, it appears most frequently in news and media contexts, with a neutral register suitable for various audiences. While there is a multitude of alternatives, like "no longer had access to" and "was deprived of access to", it's important to be mindful of the temporality of the phrase and avoid using it when referring to something that was never accessible. According to Ludwig AI the expression is valid and usable in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no longer had access to

Emphasizes the change in access status.

was deprived of access to

Highlights the act of being denied access.

was unable to access

Focuses on the inability to gain entry or use.

could not reach

Simple and direct way of expressing inability to access.

had no means of accessing

Highlights the lack of resources or methods for access.

found themselves locked out of

Suggests being excluded or prevented from entering.

was cut off from

Emphasizes a sudden or forceful removal of access.

had no admittance to

Formal way of expressing lack of entry permission.

was barred from

Indicates prohibition or prevention of access.

couldn't get to

Informal way of saying unable to reach or access.

FAQs

How can I use "lost access to" in a sentence?

You can use "lost access to" to indicate the inability to reach or use something, such as information, resources, or accounts. For example: "After the system failure, the team "lost access to" critical data."

What can I say instead of "lost access to"?

You can use alternatives like "no longer had access to", "was deprived of access to", or "was unable to access" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "lost access to" or "loss of access to"?

"Lost access to" is a verb phrase indicating the action of losing access. "Loss of access to" is a noun phrase referring to the state of having lost access. Both are correct, but they function differently in a sentence. For example: "Due to the cyberattack, the company "lost access to" its customer database" (verb phrase) versus "The cyberattack resulted in a "loss of access to" the customer database" (noun phrase).

What's the difference between "lost access to" and "never had access to"?

"Lost access to" implies that there was a previous ability to access something, which has now been removed or is no longer possible. "Never had access to" indicates that access was never granted or available in the first place. For example, "The refugees "lost access to" medical care after the conflict escalated", versus "The refugees "never had access to" adequate sanitation facilities".