loss of quality

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "loss of quality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a decrease in the standard or value of something, often in contexts related to products, services, or experiences. Example: "The loss of quality in the final product was evident after the manufacturing process was altered."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

No concert series would suffer a loss of quality if more of their work were included.

The New Yorker

Some parts have changed hands but with no loss of quality.

The New York Times - Arts

More troubling to some experts is the likelihood of an accelerating loss of quality scientists.

The New York Times

Further, unlike PET plastic bottles, aluminum cans can be recycled again and again with no loss of quality.

The Guardian

That saves time and avoids the loss of quality inherent in "dubbing" from one device to another.

The New York Times - Tech

But even if going Fairtrade meant no loss of quality, many suppliers believe their trade is already fairer than Fairtrade.

The Guardian

You can pour the captured video into a computer for editing or archiving with no loss of quality.

The New York Times - Tech

Nutritionists worry about the resulting loss of quality, but there are big gains in quantity.

The Economist

The dried leaf is then cooled quickly to prevent overdrying and loss of quality.

Encyclopedia Britannica

There is no hiss or crackling or loss of quality in that sound formed in the brain.

The Guardian - Opinion

So identifying more people who have it could result in loss of quality of life for many, without increasing longevity.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing changes in quality, be specific about what aspects are affected. Instead of saying there's a "loss of quality", specify if it's in performance, materials, or design.

Common error

Avoid using "loss of quality" without providing context. Clarify what specific attributes have declined to give the reader a clearer understanding.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "loss of quality" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes a decline or reduction in the standard or value of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is widely accepted in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

34%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "loss of quality" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to describe a decline in standard or value. As Ludwig AI confirms, its versatility allows its presence in various contexts, ranging from scientific discussions to everyday observations reported in news media. When using "loss of quality", ensure that the context provides specific details about what aspects of the item have declined. Alternatives such as "decline in quality" or "deterioration in quality" can be used to add nuance. The phrase maintains a neutral register and its high occurrence across diverse sources underscores its widespread acceptance and utility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

decline in quality

Replaces "loss" with "decline", suggesting a gradual decrease.

deterioration in quality

Emphasizes the process of becoming worse.

reduction in quality

Focuses on the diminished level of quality.

impairment of quality

Highlights the damage or weakening of quality.

degradation of quality

Implies a lowering of moral or intellectual character, in addition to the reduction of standards.

erosion of quality

Suggests a gradual wearing away or disappearance of quality.

fall in standard

Shifts the focus to the "standard" rather than "quality".

inferior quality

Indicates a state of being lower in rank, status, or quality.

compromised quality

Suggests that the quality has been negatively affected or weakened.

drop in excellence

Replaces "quality" with "excellence", emphasizing a high level of quality.

FAQs

How can I use "loss of quality" in a sentence?

You can use "loss of quality" to describe a decline in the standard of something, such as "The company experienced a "loss of quality" in their products after the change in suppliers."

What can I say instead of "loss of quality"?

You can use alternatives like "decline in quality", "deterioration in quality", or "reduction in quality" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "loss of quality" or "lost of quality"?

"Loss of quality" is the correct phrase. "Lost of quality" is grammatically incorrect.

What's the difference between "loss of quality" and "lack of quality"?

"Loss of quality" implies that there was a higher standard previously, while "lack of quality" suggests that the standard was never present.