Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

loss due to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

'loss due to' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that there is a cause-and-effect relationship between two things, with the first leading to the second. For example: "The company reported a significant loss due to bad weather at the start of the season."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"It was not a loss due to hair thinning".

News & Media

The New York Times

Few homeowners' insurance policies cover loss due to nuclear accidents.

News & Media

The New York Times

"This year has seen massive suffering and loss due to extreme weather disasters.

News & Media

The Guardian

It was another uncounted loss due to the incalculable historic mistake of Islamic terrorism.

News & Media

The New Yorker

In 2014, Here generated €971m (£682m) in sales but made a €1.2bn operating loss due to a large goodwill impairment.

The restricting type is characterized as unhealthy weight loss due to food restriction.

The second category will generally be subject to loss due to transpiration by plants.

Economic loss due to missed workdays.

Economic loss due to reduced productivity.

loss due to fading given by, loss due to collision represented by, loss due to the mismatching between the estimated version of the channel and the real channel.

Therefore, the loss due to deterioration should not be ignored.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "loss due to", ensure that the cause is clearly and directly linked to the resulting loss. This helps maintain clarity and avoids ambiguity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "loss due to" when the cause is not clearly established or is only speculative. Instead, use phrases like "potential loss" or "possible loss" to indicate uncertainty.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "loss due to" functions as a causal connector, linking a negative outcome (loss) with its cause. As Ludwig AI confirms, it establishes a direct relationship between two events. Examples show it used across diverse contexts, from economic downturns to environmental factors.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

33%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Wiki

7%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "loss due to" is a commonly used and grammatically correct phrase that functions as a causal connector, linking a negative outcome with its cause. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English to indicate a cause-and-effect relationship. It is appropriate for a neutral register and appears frequently in scientific, news, and encyclopedic contexts. When using this phrase, ensure the cause is clearly linked to the loss to maintain clarity. Consider alternatives such as "loss resulting from" or "loss caused by" for variety. Avoid using the phrase when the cause of loss is only speculative.

FAQs

How can I use "loss due to" in a sentence?

Use "loss due to" to indicate a cause-and-effect relationship where something has been lost as a result of a specific factor. For example, "The company experienced a significant "loss due to" the recent economic downturn."

What are some alternatives to "loss due to"?

Is it correct to say "loss because of" instead of "loss due to"?

While "loss because of" is understandable, ""loss due to"" is generally considered more formal and grammatically precise in written English.

What's the difference between "loss due to" and "damage from"?

"Loss due to" generally refers to a broader sense of deprivation or detriment, while "damage from" typically refers to physical harm or impairment. The choice depends on the specific context of the situation.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: