lose value with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lose value with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing how something diminishes in worth or significance over time or due to certain conditions. Example: "As technology advances, older models of smartphones tend to lose value with each passing year."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

One obstacle for would-be parking capitalists is that the tickets lose value with each passing second.

The New York Times

These require banks to hold big cushions of capital to protect themselves in case trading positions lose value, with bonds requiring particularly large and expensive cushions.

The New York Times

Like Cane and Rinse, the boutique nature of the show allows for the creation of evergreen episodes that don't lose value with time, and you can find yourself delving into the Retronauts back catalogue in search of a pixelated fix during the wait between new installments.

Vice

Like Cane and Rinse, the boutique nature of the show allows for the creation of evergreen episodes that don't lose value with time, and you can find yourself delving into the Retronauts back catalogue in search of a pixelated fix during the wait between new instalments.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

There is a risk that Japan, China and the US will not sit on their hands while the euro loses value, with the world possibly even sliding into a currency war.

The Guardian - Business

'Our home, in which we had invested so many dreams and so much money, is losing value with every day that passes.' Bergsson recognises, all the same, that there are many people worse off than he is.

The Guardian

Lawsuits filed in various states have been brought by, among others, fishermen who have lost their livelihoods, investors whose portfolios are losing value with the plunge in BP's stock price, and underwriters of insurance policies who are trying to block BP from collecting payments.

The New York Times

Although stocks rose, the Indian currency lost value, with a dollar buying 49.95 Indian rupees, up from 48.80 late on Thursday.

Forbes

"People who are losing value with their contemporary collections are turning to Old Masters," says Konrad Bernheimer of P&D Colnaghi in London, one of the world's leading dealers in Old Master paintings and drawings.

Forbes

Purchasing reproductions is losing value, with the original gaining as the ideal.

Huffington Post

While other major oil producing economies have let their currencies lose value along with oil prices, Nigeria has spent its reserves to prop up the value of the naira.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "lose value with", ensure that the context clearly indicates what is causing the decline in value. This clarifies the relationship and makes the sentence more informative.

Common error

Avoid assuming correlation equals causation. Just because something "loses value with" a particular factor doesn't necessarily mean that factor is the direct cause. Be sure to have evidence supporting a causal relationship.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lose value with" functions as a verb phrase that describes a process of depreciation or decline, specifying that the loss in value occurs in relation to or alongside another element or factor. Ludwig's examples illustrate how this phrase is used to connect the diminishing worth of something to a corresponding condition or event.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

12%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "lose value with" is used to describe the process of something diminishing in worth or significance alongside another element. As shown by Ludwig, this phrase appears mostly in News & Media contexts. While grammatically sound, its relative infrequency suggests that alternative phrasings might be more common. The phrase is generally used in a neutral to professional register, suitable for analytical and descriptive writing. Understanding the context in which value is lost is crucial for using this phrase effectively.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

depreciate in value with

Mirrors the original phrase but uses a more formal term for monetary devaluation.

decline in worth with

Emphasizes the decreasing monetary or material worth alongside a related element.

diminish in importance with

Focuses on the reduction of significance or relevance in relation to something else.

decrease in significance with

Highlights the lessening of noteworthiness or impact in conjunction with another factor.

degrade in quality with

Points to a reduction in the standard or condition alongside a connected aspect.

deteriorate in condition with

Indicates a worsening of state or health, influenced by an additional factor.

wane in influence with

Indicates a weakening of persuasive power or effect together with another element.

erode in stature with

Shows a gradual decline in reputation or status alongside an associated factor.

lessen in appeal with

Highlights a reduction in attractiveness or desirability related to something else.

fall in esteem with

Suggests a drop in respect or admiration in connection with an accompanying element.

FAQs

How can I use "lose value with" in a sentence?

You can use "lose value with" to describe how something decreases in worth or importance over time, such as "Parking tickets "lose value with" each passing second".

What is a good alternative to the phrase "lose value with"?

A suitable alternative to "lose value with" is "decline in worth with", which also conveys the idea of diminishing value but may be appropriate for different contexts.

Is it correct to say "decrease value with" instead of "lose value with"?

Yes, "decrease value with" is grammatically correct and can be used interchangeably with "lose value with", though the latter may be more common in everyday language.

What is the difference between "lose value with" and "lose value because of"?

"Lose value with" implies a correlation or association, while "lose value because of" suggests a direct causal relationship. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize a link or a cause-and-effect dynamic.