long argued for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "long argued for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been advocated or supported for an extended period of time. Example: "The policy change is something that many experts have long argued for, emphasizing its necessity for environmental sustainability."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I have long argued for a referendum.

Independent

I've long argued for such shifts.

The New York Times

We've long argued for this".

The Guardian

This newspaper has long argued for such a move.

The Economist

Governments in emerging economies have long argued for this.

The Economist

Extradition campaigners have long argued for a forum bar.

Independent

You've long argued for the decriminalization of marijuana.

The New York Times - Magazine

This is something I have long argued for.

The Guardian - Opinion

He has long argued for an alternative: personalised rents.

The Guardian - Money

"The SNP has long argued for fairer voting.

The Guardian

He had long argued for the establishment of a Canadian voice in imperial policy.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "long argued for", ensure the context clearly establishes the duration and consistency of the argument. This emphasizes the depth of commitment to the advocated position.

Common error

Avoid using "long argued for" when referring to a single instance of advocacy. This phrase emphasizes a sustained and repeated position, not a one-time argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "long argued for" functions as a verbal phrase indicating sustained advocacy or support. It highlights the duration and consistency of a particular viewpoint or action, as demonstrated in examples provided by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

74%

Academia

9%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Science

3%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "long argued for" is a verbal phrase indicating sustained advocacy or support over a considerable period. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability, showing it's frequently used in news and media, with notable presence in academic and encyclopedia contexts. Alternatives include "consistently advocated" and "repeatedly championed". When employing "long argued for", it's crucial to ensure the context reflects the extended duration of the argument, differentiating it from single instances of support. By using this phrase correctly, writers can effectively convey the depth and consistency of a viewpoint, adding credibility and emphasis to their message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

consistently advocated

Emphasizes the unwavering nature of the advocacy.

repeatedly championed

Highlights the act of publicly supporting or defending a cause.

steadfastly promoted

Focuses on the resolute and persistent promotion of something.

persistently pushed for

Indicates a continuous and determined effort to achieve something.

historically supported

Highlights past support, implying a long-standing commitment.

traditionally advocated

Suggests advocacy based on established practices or beliefs.

incessantly lobbied for

Emphasizes relentless efforts to influence decision-makers.

regularly campaigned for

Highlights organized efforts to promote a particular cause.

chronically defended

Implies a habitual defense of something, often against opposition.

enduringly promoted

Focuses on the lasting nature of the promotional efforts.

FAQs

How can I use "long argued for" in a sentence?

Use "long argued for" to show that a person, group, or publication has consistently supported or advocated for something over a considerable period. For example, "Experts have "long argued for" increased funding for renewable energy research".

What are some alternatives to "long argued for"?

Alternatives include "consistently advocated", "repeatedly championed", or "steadfastly promoted", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more correct to say "long argued for" or "has long argued for"?

"Has "long argued for"" is grammatically correct, as it uses the present perfect tense, but ""long argued for"" can be acceptable when the auxiliary verb is implied, particularly in headlines or concise statements.

What's the difference between "long argued for" and "previously supported"?

"Long argued for" implies a sustained and ongoing advocacy, whereas "previously supported" suggests that support existed in the past but may not be current. "Long argued for" indicates active and continuous endorsement.