listed from highest to lowest priority

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "listed from highest to lowest priority" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing a sequence or order of items based on their importance or urgency. Example: "The tasks for the project are listed from highest to lowest priority to ensure we focus on the most critical items first."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The algorithm serves each queue in RR fashion from highest to lowest priority class.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Table 2 shows the classification of the panelists' scores in three categories from high to low priority.

BMC Health Services Research

Then, rounding down operation is applied from the highest to lowest priority ( {m}_{ell, e}^{j_t} )s one by one.

Journal of Cloud Computing

Thus, if the first atom is the lowest priority atom (often H), and the remaining atoms are listed from highest to lowest for example, [C@H](Br)(CC)(C then @ is "R" (H in back; read left-to-right highest to lowest), while @@ is "S".

Journal of Cheminformatics

Then demand your customer to prioritize the list of deliverables from highest to lowest so that you can adjust these priorities with the undertakings in your plan.

WikiHow

Gene listing is ordered from highest to lowest rank.

BMC Genomics

Their priorities from highest to lowest are: UGS, rtPS/ErtPS, nrtPS, and BE.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Improvement priority was determined from highest to lowest as follows: perceptual characteristics (D1), added characteristics (D2), and software characteristics (D3).

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Thus, all sources are ordered from highest to the lowest priority.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Columns list the gene top 20, from high to low.

BMC Genomics

Therefore, the orders of GP priority from high to low is g1g2,…,g Ng.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When prioritizing items, clearly define the criteria for determining "highest" and "lowest" priority to ensure consistent application of the "listed from highest to lowest priority" order.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "listed from highest to lowest priority" without specifying what determines the priority. Ensure readers understand the basis for prioritization (e.g., urgency, impact, cost).

Linguistic Context

The phrase "listed from highest to lowest priority" functions as a modifier, specifically clarifying the order in which items are presented. It indicates a structured arrangement based on the relative importance or urgency of the items.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "listed from highest to lowest priority" is a grammatically correct and readily understandable phrase used to indicate a sequential arrangement based on importance or urgency. According to Ludwig, while the phrase itself is straightforward, ensuring clarity by specifying the criteria for determining priority is crucial. Alternative phrases like "ranked in descending order of priority" or "prioritized from most to least important" offer similar meanings. While no direct examples were found in the provided data, the analysis confirms its usability across various contexts, especially when accompanied by clear priority definitions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ranked in descending order of priority

Replaces "listed from" with "ranked in" and uses "descending order" to specify the direction of priority.

prioritized from most to least important

Substitutes "listed" with "prioritized" and uses "most to least important" to express the priority order.

ordered by importance, descending

Uses "ordered by importance" and specifies "descending" to indicate the arrangement from highest to lowest.

arranged from most crucial to least crucial

Replaces "highest to lowest priority" with "most crucial to least crucial", emphasizing criticality.

categorized by priority, high to low

Uses "categorized by priority" and specifies "high to low" for the order.

sorted by precedence, top to bottom

Replaces "priority" with "precedence" and uses "top to bottom" to indicate the descending order.

classified according to importance, decreasing

Uses "classified according to importance" and specifies "decreasing" for the priority order.

graded by urgency, most to least

Replaces "priority" with "urgency" and uses "most to least" to describe the order.

sequenced by significance, descending

Substitutes "listed" with "sequenced" and uses "significance" as a synonym for priority, with "descending" indicating the order.

organized from critical to non-critical

Replaces "highest to lowest priority" with "critical to non-critical", focusing on the level of criticality.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "listed from highest to lowest priority" in a sentence?

Use "listed from highest to lowest priority" to clearly indicate an ordering based on importance or urgency. For example: "The project tasks are "listed from highest to lowest priority" to ensure critical items are addressed first."

What are some alternatives to saying "listed from highest to lowest priority"?

You can use alternatives like "ranked in descending order of priority", "prioritized from most to least important", or "ordered by importance, descending".

Is it always necessary to specify the criteria when using "listed from highest to lowest priority"?

While not always grammatically required, specifying the criteria for priority adds clarity and avoids ambiguity. For instance, "listed from highest to lowest priority based on impact" is more informative than simply "listed from highest to lowest priority".

How does "listed from highest to lowest priority" differ from "ranked in order of importance"?

"Listed from highest to lowest priority" specifically implies a sequential arrangement, while "ranked in order of importance" focuses more on relative significance without necessarily implying a sequential list. They are largely interchangeable, but the former emphasizes the listing aspect.