limitations of

USAGE SUMMARY

"limitations of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you need to refer to the limits or restrictions of something. For example, "The limitations of this technology are becoming clear."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There are limitations, of course.

The New York Times

Limitations of Liability and Remedies.

Harvard University

The limitations of memory will intercede".

The New Yorker

Tells about the limitations of U.N. power.

The New Yorker

What are the limitations of radar images?

The New York Times

But China highlights the limitations of MegaBrew.

The Guardian - Business

We've spoken about the limitations of photography.

The New Yorker

This highlighted the limitations of the methodology.

The Economist

This system has its limitations, of course.

The New York Times

First, consider the limitations of the data.

The Economist

It also addresses the limitations of technology.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the "limitations of" a concept or technology, be specific about what those limitations are and their practical implications.

Common error

Avoid simply stating that something has "limitations" without providing concrete examples or details. Always clarify exactly what those limitations entail.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "limitations of" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically used to specify the boundaries, shortcomings, or restrictions associated with a particular subject, concept, or method. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

30%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Academia

10%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "limitations of" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to denote the boundaries, restrictions, or weaknesses inherent in a given subject. According to Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and widely used across various domains, from News & Media to Science. When using this phrase, it's important to be specific about what those limitations are to avoid overgeneralizations. Alternative phrases like "restrictions of" or "weaknesses of" can be used depending on the specific context. Being clear about the "limitations of" any topic allows for critical analysis and promotes informed decision-making.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

restrictions of

Similar to "limitations", but can imply more formally imposed boundaries.

weaknesses of

Directly addresses the flaws or deficiencies inherent in something.

shortcomings of

Highlights the defects or areas where something falls short of expectations.

restraints of

Focuses on the forces that hold something back or limit its movement or development.

constrains of

Highlights factors that restrict or control something.

constraints of

Emphasizes factors that restrict or control something's scope or activity.

caps of

Refers to upper bounds or maximum limits.

confines of

Emphasizes the boundaries or enclosed space within which something operates.

ceilings of

Like "caps", implies an upper limit or maximum value.

requirements of

Highlights necessary conditions or demands that restrict possibilities.

FAQs

How can I use "limitations of" in a sentence?

Use "limitations of" to specify restrictions or weaknesses. For example, "The "limitations of the study" affected the results" or "Understand the "limitations of technology" before implementation".

What are some alternatives to "limitations of"?

You can use alternatives like "weaknesses of", "restrictions of", or "constraints of" depending on the context.

What is the difference between "limitations of" and "advantages of"?

"Limitations of" highlights the drawbacks or restrictions, while "advantages of" points out the benefits or strengths. They are antonyms used to provide a balanced view.

Is it better to focus on "limitations of" or "potential of" something?

It depends on your goal. Highlighting "limitations of" is useful for critical analysis and risk assessment. Focusing on "potential of" is better for promoting innovation and opportunities.