constraints of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "constraints of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to limitations or restrictions imposed by certain factors or conditions. Example: "The constraints of the project timeline forced us to prioritize certain tasks over others."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Administrations face constraints, of course.

The New York Times

They are also constraints, of course.

The New York Times - Arts

These novels have pushed at the constraints of the genre.

The Guardian - Books

It freed her from the constraints of good taste".

The New Yorker

I deeply felt the constraints of 'correct' English.

The Guardian - Books

More important, he played within the constraints of the game.

The New York Times - Sports

The constraints of Room made it easier too.

The Guardian - Books

It's more about being "freed from the constraints of".

The Guardian

He is freed from the constraints of political consequences.

The Guardian - Opinion

Other writers have left the constraints of realism behind.

The Guardian - Books

We are abandoning the constraints of geography and national boundaries".

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "constraints of", ensure that the noun following "of" is specific and clearly defines the limiting factor. For example, prefer "constraints of budget" over "constraints of things".

Common error

Avoid using vague or overly general nouns after "constraints of". Instead of saying "constraints of life", be more specific and say "constraints of limited resources" or "constraints of societal expectations" to provide clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "constraints of" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun. According to Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used. It identifies limiting factors that affect a subject, action, or process.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

39%

Formal & Business

19%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "constraints of" is a versatile and grammatically sound construction used to denote limitations or restrictions imposed by specific factors. Ludwig confirms its correctness and widespread usage. It is particularly common in news, scientific, and formal business contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure that the following noun is specific and clearly defines the limiting factor. Alternatives like "limitations of" or "restrictions of" can be used depending on the nuance you want to convey. Ludwig's examples provide ample illustrations of its application across various domains.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

limitations imposed by

Focuses on the imposition of limits rather than the existence of constraints.

restrictions dictated by

Emphasizes the dictatorial nature of the restrictions.

confines determined by

Highlights the boundaries established by certain factors.

parameters defined by

Highlights parameters as a set of rules that delimit what is possible.

conditions governed by

Specifies the rule of conditions over the limitations.

impediments presented by

Shifts the focus to the obstacles created by something.

challenges posed by

Highlights the difficulties resulting from something.

barriers erected by

Introduces the concept of deliberately created obstacles.

strictures enforced by

Focuses on the rigidity and enforcement of the restrictions.

restraints required by

Emphasizes the necessity of the restraints.

FAQs

How can I use "constraints of" in a sentence?

You can use "constraints of" to indicate limitations or restrictions imposed by something. For example: "The project suffered due to the "constraints of time"".

What's a good alternative to "constraints of"?

Alternatives include "limitations of", "restrictions of", or "confines of", depending on the specific context.

How does "constraints of" differ from "limitations of"?

"Constraints of" often implies a more forceful restriction or a specific set of limitations, while "limitations of" can be a broader term for general restrictions.

Is it better to say "the constraint of" or "the constraints of"?

Use "the constraint of" when referring to a single, specific limitation. Use "the constraints of" when referring to multiple or general limitations, such as "the "constraints of budget and time"".