like for like comparison

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "like for like comparison" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used when comparing two similar items or entities to ensure that the comparison is fair and valid. Example: "To assess the performance of the two products, we need to conduct a like for like comparison of their features and prices."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

To provide "a like for like" comparison between SDQ and non-SDQ studies, we also report the unweighted Hedges' g for SDQ studies.

European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Maybe a like for like comparison is needed.

The Guardian - Sport

"So as such, this is not a like for like comparison with his existing fixed rate," Mr Bunton says.

The Guardian - Money

For those who point to Next's strong directory/online performance (16.9%), Asos management itself said that this was not a like for like comparison at the interims as Next has a different (older), more resilient customer demographic.

The Guardian - Business

It's not a like for like comparison.

TechCrunch

On iOS Vestager said it's not a like for like comparison because Apple does not license its operating system as Google does with Android.

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

However, the benchmark comparison doesn't necessarily mean that the maximum core count will be 8 - AMD was likely just doing a like-for-like comparison.

Forbes

That like-for-like comparison yields a growth rate of 8.9%.

The Economist

In a like-for-like comparison, these two triblock copolymers appeared to have similar effects on the release of lysozyme.

Materials Science and Engineering: C

In both cases we compared a rate of dose with an amount of dose, which one reader suggested is not a like-for-like comparison and therefore meaningless.

The Guardian

"It's getting harder and harder to do a like-for-like comparison, which is what most consumers rely on to choose between one financial product and another".

The Guardian - Money

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When conducting a "like for like comparison", ensure all variables are as consistent as possible to minimize bias and ensure a valid result.

Common error

Avoid performing a "like for like comparison" without first confirming that the compared items are truly comparable. Overlooking critical differences can lead to flawed conclusions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "like for like comparison" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to describe a method or process of evaluating two or more things under equivalent conditions. Ludwig AI validates its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "like for like comparison" is used to describe a method of comparing similar items under equivalent conditions to ensure a fair and accurate assessment. This guide has shown, through various real-world examples provided by Ludwig, that it is grammatically correct and commonly used in news, science, and business contexts. While alternatives such as "apples to apples comparison" exist, "like for like comparison" maintains a neutral and professional register, suitable for diverse applications. It’s crucial to ensure that all variables are consistent when making such comparisons to avoid skewed results and flawed conclusions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

apples to apples comparison

Emphasizes a direct, uncomplicated comparison of equivalent items.

equivalent comparison

Focuses on the equality or correspondence of the compared items.

direct comparison

Highlights the straightforward nature of the comparison.

parallel comparison

Suggests a side-by-side examination of similar aspects.

comparable analysis

Emphasizes the analytical nature of the comparison and the similarity of the items.

similar comparison

A more general phrase indicating that the items being compared share similarities.

matching comparison

Implies a comparison where the items are closely aligned or identical.

uniform comparison

Focuses on the consistency and standardization of the comparison process.

standardized comparison

Highlights the use of consistent standards in the comparison.

fair comparison

Emphasizes the impartiality and justness of the comparative assessment.

FAQs

What does "like for like comparison" mean?

A "like for like comparison" means comparing similar items or situations in a way that is fair and equivalent, ensuring that all key variables are consistent.

How do you use "like for like comparison" in a sentence?

You can use "like for like comparison" in a sentence like this: "To accurately assess the effectiveness of each marketing campaign, we need to conduct a "like for like comparison" of their results."

What's a good alternative for "like for like comparison"?

A good alternative for "like for like comparison" is "apples to apples comparison", which conveys the same idea of comparing equivalent things.

When is it not appropriate to use a "like for like comparison"?

It's not appropriate to use a "like for like comparison" when the items or situations being compared have significant differences that would skew the results.