liable to randomness

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "liable to randomness" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or outcome that is subject to chance or unpredictability. Example: "The results of the experiment were found to be liable to randomness, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

"You're liable to kill somebody".

The New Yorker

Inclined hangers are more liable to fatigue.

Engineering Structures

That's liable to be controversial.

The New York Times

Someone was liable to enter after all.

The New Yorker

They are also liable to change suddenly.

The Economist

This change is liable to be unpredictable.

Measurement

Electronics have become less liable to explode.

The Economist

Hydrophobic particles are liable to aggregate in collision.

Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International

These flow patterns are liable to induce thrombus.

Journal of Biomechanics

Hydrophobic particles in water are liable to aggregate in collision.

Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International

"He's liable to really throw anything".

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing experiments or data, use "liable to randomness" to acknowledge that unpredictable variations might affect the results. This adds a layer of transparency and scientific rigor.

Common error

Avoid using "liable to randomness" when the outcome is completely deterministic. The phrase implies a degree of unpredictability, so it's unsuitable for describing processes with fixed results.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "liable to randomness" functions as a descriptive modifier, indicating that something is susceptible to unpredictable variations or chance occurrences. It describes a characteristic of a process or system.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "liable to randomness" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe situations susceptible to unpredictable variations. Ludwig AI suggests that while the phrase is valid, it appears to be infrequently used. Given the limited usage data, its most appropriate contexts are formal or scientific discussions where acknowledging the role of chance is important. Consider alternatives such as "prone to randomness" or "subject to randomness" for broader appeal. The best practice is to apply it thoughtfully when describing systems where unpredictability is a known factor, avoiding overuse in deterministic scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

prone to randomness

Replaces "liable" with "prone", suggesting a natural inclination towards randomness.

subject to randomness

Substitutes "liable" with "subject", indicating that randomness has influence.

susceptible to randomness

Uses "susceptible" instead of "liable", emphasizing vulnerability to randomness.

vulnerable to randomness

Replaces "liable" with "vulnerable", highlighting the potential negative impact of randomness.

open to randomness

Suggests a state of being receptive or exposed to random influences.

at the mercy of randomness

Emphasizes a lack of control over random events.

governed by chance

Focuses on the role of chance in determining outcomes.

influenced by random factors

Highlights the impact of unpredictable elements on a situation.

contingent on randomness

Indicates dependence on unpredictable events.

randomness is a factor

A simple statement emphasizing randomness being part of the situation.

FAQs

How can I use "liable to randomness" in a sentence?

You can use "liable to randomness" to describe situations where chance or unpredictable factors play a significant role. For example, "The stock market's fluctuations are "liable to randomness", making it difficult to predict future trends."

What's a more formal alternative to "liable to randomness"?

A more formal alternative would be "subject to stochastic variation" or "prone to stochastic influences". These alternatives are better suited for academic or scientific contexts.

Is it correct to say something is "completely liable to randomness"?

Saying something is "completely "liable to randomness"" could be seen as redundant. The phrase already implies a significant degree of unpredictability. Consider using a stronger synonym for "liable" or rephrasing to emphasize the extent of randomness.

How does "liable to randomness" differ from "influenced by randomness"?

"Liable to randomness" suggests a stronger susceptibility or inherent characteristic of being affected by chance. "Influenced by randomness" simply indicates that randomness is one of the factors affecting the outcome, but not necessarily the primary one.