Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
less vulnerable to errors
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "less vulnerable to errors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing systems, processes, or methods that have a reduced likelihood of making mistakes or encountering issues. Example: "The new software update has made the application less vulnerable to errors, improving overall performance."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
more reliable and accurate
least prone to errors
less prone to error
less prone to making mistakes
less prone to defects
less prone to bubbles
less prone to mistakes
less venerable to errors
less prone to errors
less susceptible to mistakes
less prone to inconsistencies
less likely to have errors
less prone to chills
less prone to mishaps
less prone to landslides
less susceptible to errors
less prone to problems
less sensitive to errors
more reliable
less vulnerable to inaccuracies
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
The use of dichotomized cord adducts is preferable because dichotomization is less vulnerable to errors in measurement, does not materially lose information, and permits comparison of the most highly exposed children with those who had lower exposure.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
That will still be cheaper, simpler and less vulnerable to error than the old system, the Cuomo people say.
News & Media
As a result, PST is less vulnerable to recognition errors.
This may be why systematic search is generally less vulnerable to miss errors (Mitroff, Biggs, & Cain, 2015).
Evaluate incidence rates over time: longitudinal studies are needed to determine trends related to the incidence of diagnostic error, to identify any fluctuations in types of diagnostic errors in different settings and to understand what types of diagnoses might be more or less vulnerable to diagnostic error over time (eg, in response to the adoption of new diagnostic procedures and technologies).
Science
And the two reactors are of a kind that has never been built before, the AP1000, a model by Westinghouse that is supposed to withstand earthquakes and plane crashes and be less vulnerable to operator error or to a loss of all electricity, the last of which caused the triple meltdown at Fukushima.
News & Media
Moreover, the longitudinal and prospective design is less vulnerable to measurement error, which is a risk in cross-sectional or retrospective studies [ 45, 46].
Science
This is because the primary user is less vulnerable to channel estimation errors and can profit from the power level decrease of the victim user.
Nevertheless, while the usage of a dichotomous classification of drunkenness might be considered a crude type of assessment, it is probably less vulnerable to such reporting errors.
Science
The range of intensities makes this method less vulnerable to these 2 sources of error.
Science
not merely less vulnerable to randomness and chaos, but actually "antifragile" — poised to benefit or take advantage of stress, errors and change, the way, say, the mythological Hydra generated two new heads, each time one was cut off.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When aiming for clarity, specify the type of "errors" you're addressing to provide context and avoid ambiguity. For example, "less vulnerable to calculation errors".
Common error
Avoid implying complete immunity to errors. Even systems designed to be "less vulnerable" can still experience them. Acknowledge the possibility of errors, even if minimized.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "less vulnerable to errors" functions as an adjective phrase, modifying a noun by indicating a reduced susceptibility to mistakes or inaccuracies. Ludwig provides examples illustrating its use in describing systems, processes, or designs.
Frequent in
Science
58%
News & Media
35%
Wiki
3%
Less common in
Formal & Business
2%
Encyclopedias
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "less vulnerable to errors" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to describe systems, processes, or designs that have a reduced susceptibility to mistakes. Ludwig highlights its frequent use in scientific and news contexts. When using this phrase, specifying the type of "errors" can improve clarity, and it's important to avoid implying complete immunity. Alternative phrases include "less prone to mistakes" and "more resistant to errors". Remember that even systems designed to be "less vulnerable" can still experience errors, so it is crucial to acknowledge their potential occurrence. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is appropriate for describing improvements in reliability across various fields.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
less prone to mistakes
Replaces "vulnerable" with "prone" and "errors" with "mistakes", indicating a natural tendency rather than susceptibility.
less susceptible to errors
Substitutes "vulnerable" with "susceptible", emphasizing a lack of resistance.
less exposed to errors
Focuses on reducing exposure as a way to avoid errors, shifting the emphasis from inherent weakness to external influence.
more resistant to errors
Uses a positive construction with "resistant" instead of avoiding vulnerability, highlighting robustness.
less sensitive to errors
Highlights the phrase's ability to maintain functionality despite the presence of errors.
better protected against errors
Emphasizes the protective measures in place to prevent errors from causing harm.
more immune to errors
Suggests a complete lack of susceptibility, which is a stronger claim than simply being less vulnerable.
errors have less impact
Shifts the focus from preventing errors to minimizing their consequences.
designed for robustness
Emphasizes the intentional design for withstanding errors, focusing on overall system integrity.
mitigates the risk of errors
This focuses on lessening the probability of error occurrence.
FAQs
How can I use "less vulnerable to errors" in a sentence?
You can use "less vulnerable to errors" to describe systems, processes, or methods that have a reduced likelihood of making mistakes. For example: "The new software update has made the application "less vulnerable to errors", improving overall performance."
What are some alternatives to "less vulnerable to errors"?
Alternatives include "less prone to mistakes", "more resistant to errors", or "better protected against errors", depending on the specific context.
Is it better to say "less vulnerable to errors" or "more resistant to errors"?
Both "less vulnerable to errors" and "more resistant to errors" are valid, but they have slightly different connotations. "Less vulnerable" suggests a reduced susceptibility, while "more resistant" implies a stronger ability to withstand errors. Choose the phrase that best reflects the specific context.
What does it mean for something to be "less vulnerable to errors"?
When something is "less vulnerable to errors", it means it's designed or structured in a way that minimizes the chance of mistakes occurring or reduces the negative impact of errors if they do happen. This could be due to improved design, better controls, or other mitigating factors.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested