less vulnerable

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less vulnerable" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a reduced susceptibility to harm, risk, or attack in various contexts, such as cybersecurity, personal safety, or emotional resilience. Example: "By implementing stronger security measures, the organization became less vulnerable to cyberattacks."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Hyundai is even less vulnerable.

The New York Times

Europe seems less vulnerable.

The New York Times

That makes the building less vulnerable".

The New York Times - Science

We have become less vulnerable, more diversified.

The New York Times

Saudi Arabia is hardly less vulnerable now.

The New York Times

But their pitch swayed other ostensibly much less vulnerable marks.

The Guardian - Money

Are we more or less vulnerable to a terrorist attack?

The New York Times

I certainly felt less vulnerable becoming a mother.

The Guardian

And even Amgen might be less vulnerable than first appears.

The New York Times

Otherwise, they would prefer stocks that are less vulnerable.

The New York Times

It would also be less vulnerable to legal challenge.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less vulnerable", ensure that you clearly specify what the subject is less vulnerable to. Providing context enhances clarity and prevents ambiguity. For instance, specify "less vulnerable to cyberattacks" rather than just "less vulnerable".

Common error

Avoid using "less vulnerable" without specifying the type of vulnerability. Overgeneralizing can make your statement vague and less impactful. Always provide the context to clarify the nature of the reduced vulnerability.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less vulnerable" functions primarily as a comparative adjective phrase. It modifies a noun, indicating that the noun possesses a reduced degree of vulnerability compared to a previous state or another entity. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and frequent usage in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "less vulnerable" is a versatile and frequently used comparative adjective phrase that indicates a reduced susceptibility to harm or risk. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and widely applicable. It's commonly found in news, scientific, and business contexts, where it serves to inform or reassure about improved safety or resilience. When using "less vulnerable", it's crucial to specify the context of the vulnerability to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "more protected" or "more secure" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

more protected

Emphasizes the presence of active measures providing safety or defense.

more secure

Highlights the state of being free from danger or threat.

less exposed

Focuses on the reduction of visibility or accessibility to potential harm.

more resilient

Suggests an increased ability to recover quickly from difficulties or toughness.

more fortified

Implies strengthening or reinforcing to resist attack.

better defended

Highlights the improvement in defensive capabilities.

harder to affect

Emphasizes resistance to influence or impact.

less susceptible

Indicates a decreased likelihood of being affected or harmed.

more resistant

Suggests an inherent ability to withstand negative influences.

less at risk

Focuses on the reduced probability of experiencing danger or negative outcomes.

FAQs

How can I use "less vulnerable" in a sentence?

You can use "less vulnerable" to indicate a reduced susceptibility to harm, risk, or attack. For example: "After the upgrade, the system is "less vulnerable" to viruses".

What are some alternatives to saying "less vulnerable"?

Alternatives to "less vulnerable" include "more protected", "more secure", or "less exposed". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "less vulnerable" or "more secure"?

The choice between "less vulnerable" and "more secure" depends on the intended emphasis. "Less vulnerable" implies a reduction in susceptibility, while "more secure" suggests an increase in protection. Both are correct, but convey slightly different nuances.

What makes something "less vulnerable"?

Something becomes "less vulnerable" through measures that reduce its exposure to potential harm or risk. This could include implementing stronger security measures, diversifying resources, or increasing resilience.