less super

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less super" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is not as impressive or extraordinary as something else. Example: "This movie was good, but it was definitely less super than the last one we watched."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

Does anyone want to argue that he's less super?

The New York Times

Today's leaders need more emotional breadth: less super, more human.

The Guardian

The sound is less Super Mario Brothers and more post-punk, New Wave electronica (albeit with that familiar, bleepy timbre).

The New York Times - Arts

Those who suspect that the Super Bowl is a little less super this year don't have to look far for proof.

The Guardian - Sport

Women save less super from their first ever job and the savings gap widens as they age and take time out from paid employment to have children or look after sick parents and partners.

The Guardian

Jowell insisted the plan was "very much alive", and for a brief time Blackpool anticipated a second roll of the dice as government insiders suggested the creation of a new plan consisting of two smaller, less super supercasinos.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

Companies merge and downsize and employees are left with broader job descriptions and less super-vision, he said.

The New York Times

Although Instagram soon rained on its video party, albeit with a slightly less super-short form.

TechCrunch

That a cheerleader-less Super Bowl is being played in Texas, at the home of the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, is seen here as the ultimate irony.

The New York Times

"I really started to accept my body when the trend started becoming less about super, super skinny models," she told Allure.

Huffington Post

Spend less on "super PACs" and more on research.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less super", ensure the context clearly establishes what is being compared and why it is considered "less super". This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "less super" as a generic descriptor of something negative. Instead, specify the aspect in which something is "less super" to provide more meaningful feedback.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less super" functions as a comparative adjective phrase. It's used to describe something that possesses fewer qualities of being "super" compared to something else. This is supported by Ludwig, which identifies the phrase as grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

80%

Science

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "less super" is grammatically correct and functions as a comparative adjective phrase. It is used to express that something is not as impressive, extraordinary, or excellent as something else. While Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical soundness, it's important to use it judiciously, considering the context and audience. More formal alternatives, such as "not as impressive" or "less extraordinary", may be preferable in certain situations. The phrase is most commonly found in News & Media, with less frequent usage in Science and Formal & Business contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not as impressive

Emphasizes a lower degree of impressiveness.

less extraordinary

Highlights a lack of extraordinariness.

not as great

Indicates a lower level of quality or magnitude.

somewhat inferior

Suggests a degree of inferiority.

a bit weaker

Focuses on a reduction in strength or power.

not quite as amazing

Highlights a reduced level of amazement.

less fantastic

Indicates a decrease in fantastical qualities.

not as exceptional

Emphasizes a reduced degree of exceptionality.

a little underwhelming

Highlights that is causing a feeling of being disappointed because not as good as expected.

slightly deficient

Indicates a small degree of deficiency.

FAQs

How can I use "less super" in a sentence?

You can use "less super" to compare something to a perceived ideal or another specific thing, such as, "The sequel was good, but "less super" than the original".

What is a good alternative to "less super"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "not as impressive", "less extraordinary", or "not as great".

Is it grammatically correct to say "less super"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. The phrase follows standard English grammar rules for comparative adjectives, as Ludwig AI confirms.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "less super"?

It's appropriate when you want to express that something is not as remarkable, impressive, or extraordinary as something else, such as when critiquing a movie or assessing someone's performance.