less secure for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less secure for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the comparative security of a system, method, or situation in relation to another. Example: "Using outdated software can make your network less secure for sensitive data."

✓ Grammatically correct

Retirement

Tourism

Local communities

Internet security

Politics

Employment

Data security

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

Retirement is less secure for private workers.

The New York Times

Marcelo Córdova, whose family owns the Vasija Secreta winery in Cafayate, said that Salta used to be a backwater, and less secure for tourists.

The New York Times - Travel

There are concerns that areas taken by government forces have, or will become, less secure for local communities because of the activities of militias supporting government soldiers.

The Guardian

Consequently, the San Bernardino case will make every Apple product less secure: less secure for internet banking, less secure against viruses and less secure against foreign governments.

Independent

Comey is arguing that we should make the internet less secure for everyone, at the exact time he's calling the internet "the most dangerous parking lot imaginable".

The Guardian - Opinion

But members of Congress from both parties complained that their districts were somewhat less secure for them, or pushed them into unfamiliar territory, and then came the pressure from Washington.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

Fact 3: Some jurisdictions are experimenting with prison "boot camps," spartan but less secure barracks for certain convicts.

The New York Times

Because wealth compounds over long periods of time — a dollar saved 10 years ago is worth much more than a dollar saved today — young adults probably face less secure futures for decades down the road, and even shakier retirements.

The New York Times

"That would mean a less secure future for hardworking people and their families".

BBC

Finally, remember that because clinical and research training are somewhat out of register, it is expected that your plans for your clinical future will be less secure than those for your research career.

Science Magazine

Basra, a haven of relative stability a year ago, is now less secure.One snag, for Mr Allawi and the Americans, is that no one knows exactly who the Sunni insurgents are.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less secure for", specify what the subject is less secure against. Providing context clarifies the nature of the vulnerability.

Common error

Avoid using "less secure for" without indicating the specific threat or area of vulnerability. Otherwise, the statement remains vague and unhelpful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less secure for" primarily functions as a qualifier, indicating a diminished state of safety or protection regarding something or someone. Ludwig's examples show it modifying various subjects, such as internet banking, local communities, and working people. It often introduces a cause or reason for this reduced security.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Science

23%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "less secure for" is used to express a diminished level of safety or protection in a given context. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is grammatically sound and serves to qualify a subject's vulnerability, as seen in examples spanning internet security, community safety, and financial stability. The phrase appears most frequently in news and media sources, but also holds relevance in scientific and formal business writing. When employing "less secure for", clarity is key; specify against what the subject is less secure. Alternatives include phrases like "more vulnerable to" or "at greater risk of", depending on the desired emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

more unsafe for

Directly contrasts with safety.

not as safe for

Directly contrasts with safety, using a different structure.

more vulnerable to

Replaces "less secure for" with a focus on susceptibility to harm.

at greater risk of

Emphasizes the potential danger or negative outcome.

less protected against

Highlights the lack of safeguards or defenses.

more exposed to

Suggests a lack of cover or shielding from potential threats.

more susceptible to

Indicates a higher likelihood of being affected negatively.

in a weaker position against

Focuses on the disadvantage in terms of defense or resistance.

more jeopardized for

Highlights an increased risk of failure or loss.

more threatened for

Expresses a sense of impending danger.

FAQs

What does "less secure for" mean?

The phrase "less secure for" indicates that something or someone is more vulnerable or at greater risk in a particular context or situation. It implies a comparative lack of protection or safety.

How can I use "less secure for" in a sentence?

You can use "less secure for" to describe a situation or object that is more vulnerable. For instance, "Areas taken by government forces have, or will become, "less secure for" local communities because of the activities of militias supporting government soldiers."

What are some alternatives to "less secure for"?

Alternatives to "less secure for" include "more vulnerable to", "at greater risk of", or "more exposed to", depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "less secure for"?

Yes, the phrase "less secure for" is grammatically correct. It is used to make comparisons about security or safety levels.