less risk for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less risk for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing situations or decisions that involve a reduced level of risk or danger for a particular party or outcome. Example: "Investing in established companies typically presents less risk for investors compared to startups."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

That means less risk for a merchant.

The New York Times

There's less risk for Starbucks or McDonald's to get a foothold with a few stores.

The Guardian

There was far less risk, for opponents at least, that something else would happen.

The Guardian - Sport

Forced down to lower elevations by the clouds, we were at less risk for an avalanche.

The New York Times - Magazine

There is less risk for investors, he said, and a better chance the valuation will climb.

The New York Times

He said it posed less risk for Sprint because the company was paid cash upfront.

The New York Times - Tech

There's less risk for us to get the sack if we lose against England than vice versa.

The Guardian - Sport

But that charge carries far less risk for Mr Obama than it did for his recent Democratic predecessors.

The Economist

The area has recently experienced a sharp rise in office rents, however, and putting up an office building carries much less risk for the developer, Mr. Ezratty said.

The New York Times

The contracts are no worse than those offered most newly signed artists, industry analysts said, but they carry far less risk for the record companies.

The New York Times - Arts

D. Enette Larson-Meyer: In general, vegetarians are healthier, with less risk for heart disease and obesity, although there are obese vegetarians.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less risk for", ensure the subject experiencing the reduced risk is clearly identified. For example, instead of saying "There is less risk for heart disease", specify "Vegetarians have less risk for heart disease".

Common error

Avoid using "less risk for" without clearly specifying who or what benefits from the reduced risk. Omitting this information can lead to ambiguity and weaken your statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less risk for" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase indicating a reduction in potential danger or negative outcomes. Ludwig provides numerous examples across diverse fields, demonstrating its utility in expressing relative safety or reduced likelihood.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

39%

News & Media

34%

Formal & Business

27%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "less risk for" is a common and grammatically correct way to express a reduced probability of something negative occurring. Ludwig AI confirms its widespread use across various fields, including science, news, and business. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying who or what benefits from the reduced risk. Alternatives like "lower chance of" or "reduced hazard of" offer similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis. Remember to always specify the referent in order to maximize clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lower chance of

Replaces "risk" with "chance" and restructures the sentence slightly.

reduced hazard of

Substitutes "risk" with "hazard", implying a more significant danger being mitigated.

decreased likelihood of

Emphasizes the probability aspect of risk, focusing on the reduced probability of an event.

mitigated danger of

Highlights the action of reducing danger, shifting focus from the state of risk to the process of mitigation.

safer alternative to

Presents a contrast, suggesting a comparison with a riskier option.

less exposure to

Focuses on limiting contact with a potentially harmful element.

smaller probability of

Highlights the reduced statistical likelihood of an undesirable outcome.

minimal threat of

Suggests that the risk is not entirely eliminated, but reduced to a minimal level.

diminished vulnerability to

Emphasizes the reduced susceptibility to negative effects.

weaker potential for

Implies that the risk is present but its effects are less powerful.

FAQs

How can I use "less risk for" in a sentence?

Use "less risk for" to indicate a decreased chance of something negative happening to someone or something. Example: "Investing in bonds offers "less risk for" investors than investing in stocks."

What are some alternatives to saying "less risk for"?

Alternatives include "lower chance of", "reduced hazard of", or "decreased likelihood of", depending on the specific context.

Is there a difference between "less risk for" and "lower risk for"?

"Less risk for" and "lower risk for" are often interchangeable. However, "lower risk for" may sound more formal in certain contexts.

When is it appropriate to use "less risk for" in writing?

It's appropriate to use "less risk for" when you want to convey that a particular action, situation, or group is subject to a reduced probability of experiencing something adverse.