less relevance for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less relevance for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the importance or significance of something in relation to another subject or context. Example: "The findings of this study have less relevance for urban populations compared to rural ones."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

That's interesting work, but it has less relevance for offline dating.

MIT Technology Review

Or is it a signal that an increasingly insular contemporary Western art is having less and less relevance for artists with strong formative roots elsewhere?

The New York Times - Arts

In an effort to transition "The Tonight Show" franchise, let's just say that the network had, ah, some issues of adjustment to a new world of increased options and less relevance for broadcast networks.

The New York Times

Depending on which channel there are data points that have more or less relevance for that transaction.

Forbes

The latter, although perhaps the most significant ceasefire agreements when successfully implemented, are of less relevance for present purposes.

Journal of International Humanitarian Action

Previous studies measured distraction forces either in complicated or in using inaccurate systems ignoring frictional force; many were conducted in animal experiments having less relevance for human callus distraction [10, 11, 12, 13, 14].

Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

The trends sit in telling categories: how the importance of technology will profoundly change the way restaurants function; how the notion of authenticity has less relevance, and how our lust for new and different has resulted in "restless palate syndrome" -- meaning that we can't leave simple food alone.

Huffington Post

These treatment options are of less relevance since the emergence of azithromycin as an effective treatment for yaws.

British Medical Bulletin

The basic idea for introducing such a relevance measure is that a neuron with less relevance ought to have less effect on its succeeding neurons and thus contribute less to the entire network.

Neurocomputing

In Spain, with only sporadic interest in classical antiquity, these notions had less relevance.

The Guardian - Books

The more the National Book Awards serve the former, the less relevance they'll have to the latter.

The New York Times - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less relevance for", ensure you clearly define what the subject has reduced importance or applicability to. This provides context and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "less relevance for" when a complete lack of relevance is intended. Use stronger phrases like "irrelevant to" or "not applicable to" to convey complete disconnection.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less relevance for" typically functions as a qualifier, indicating that a particular subject or piece of information holds a diminished level of importance or applicability in relation to a specific context. Ludwig AI confirms its usability.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "less relevance for" is used to express diminished importance or applicability within a specific context. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is grammatically correct and usable across various domains. It's frequently seen in scientific, news, and business contexts, suggesting a neutral to professional register. When using "less relevance for", it is important to clearly specify what the subject has reduced significance for. For situations where complete irrelevance is intended, alternatives such as "irrelevant to" are advised. Common alternatives include "diminished significance for" and "reduced importance for".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

diminished significance for

Replaces "relevance" with "significance" and "less" with "diminished", emphasizing the reduced importance.

reduced importance for

Substitutes "relevance" with "importance" and "less" with "reduced", highlighting the decreased value.

decreased applicability to

Changes "relevance" to "applicability" and "for" to "to", focusing on the reduced suitability.

limited pertinence to

Replaces "relevance" with "pertinence" and "less" with "limited", suggesting a restricted connection.

lower priority for

Changes "relevance" to "priority" and "less" to "lower", indicating a reduced level of precedence.

minor consideration for

Substitutes "relevance" with "consideration" and "less" with "minor", emphasizing the reduced attention.

secondary importance to

Changes "relevance" to "importance", indicating that something is not as relevant or important in comparison to something else.

of marginal consequence to

Replaces "relevance" with "consequence", suggesting the matter at hand is rather insignificant.

not particularly applicable to

Implies that the matter at hand is not as relevant or suitable for something else.

bears little weight for

Uses different wording while keeping the meaning of reduced weight in importance.

FAQs

How can I use "less relevance for" in a sentence?

Use "less relevance for" to indicate that something has a diminished importance or applicability in a specific context. For example, "That data has "less relevance for" this particular study".

What's a more formal alternative to "less relevance for"?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases such as "diminished significance for" or "reduced importance for" which also imply "less relevance for".

Which is correct, "less relevance for" or "less relevant to"?

Both "less relevance for" and "less relevant to" are grammatically correct, but "less relevant to" is more common. "Less relevance for" focuses on the noun "relevance", while "less relevant to" emphasizes the adjective "relevant".

When should I use "limited pertinence to" instead of "less relevance for"?

Use "limited pertinence to" when you want to emphasize the restricted connection or applicability of something. It's a more formal alternative that implies "less relevance for" a particular context.