less prone to defects

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less prone to defects" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the reliability or quality of a product, process, or system, indicating that it is less likely to have flaws or issues. Example: "The new manufacturing process has been designed to be less prone to defects, ensuring higher quality products."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Cu pads tend to be less prone to such defects than Ni/Au coated pads, but one phenomenon is a cause of growing concern for high reliability applications.

Microelectronics Reliability

Such a difference in the physiology of these epithelia may make the gastrointestinal tract less prone to a recombination defect than the breast.

Breast Cancer Research

This means they are less prone to sex-linked genetic defects.

The Economist

The fever remained, but I was less prone to chills.

The New Yorker

They were less prone to tipping forward than quad skates.

The New Yorker

Women are less prone to entitlement humor than men.

The New York Times

Critics are no less prone to this fallacy.

The New Yorker

We're lazier, too, less prone to experimentation.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

They are bigger, stronger and less prone to contagious infection.

The Economist

They are also less prone to cyclical swings.

The Economist

Today IT departments are much less prone to wasting money.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing improvements in a product or process, use "less prone to defects" to highlight the reduced likelihood of flaws, emphasizing the enhanced reliability.

Common error

Avoid implying that a product or process is completely free of defects when using "less prone to defects". Instead, focus on the reduced probability, as absolute perfection is often unattainable.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less prone to defects" functions as an adjective phrase that modifies a noun, indicating a reduced likelihood of the noun having flaws or imperfections. As Ludwig AI points out, it's a correct and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

30%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "less prone to defects" is a grammatically correct and usable expression to convey a reduced likelihood of flaws in a product, process, or system. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. While not exceedingly common, it's suitable for neutral registers across various contexts like science, news and media, and formal business settings. Remember that while "less prone to defects" suggests improvement, it doesn't guarantee a complete absence of issues.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

less susceptible to flaws

Emphasizes a reduced vulnerability to imperfections.

less vulnerable to errors

Focuses on a decreased chance of making mistakes.

less inclined to malfunction

Highlights a lower tendency to break down or operate incorrectly.

less susceptible to failure

Indicates a reduced risk of not succeeding or meeting expectations.

more resistant to imperfections

Suggests an increased ability to withstand flaws.

less at risk of deficiencies

Focuses on a decreased possibility of lacking necessary qualities or elements.

less liable to issues

Emphasizes a reduced legal or moral responsibility for problems.

less exposed to faults

Highlights a decreased level of vulnerability to shortcomings.

unlikely to present problems

Indicates a low probability of causing difficulties.

not as susceptible to impairment

Focuses on a reduced vulnerability to damage or weakening.

FAQs

How can I use "less prone to defects" in a sentence?

You can use "less prone to defects" to describe products, processes, or systems that have a reduced likelihood of having flaws or issues. For example, "The new manufacturing process is "less prone to defects", ensuring higher quality products."

What are some alternatives to "less prone to defects"?

Alternatives include "less susceptible to flaws", "more reliable", or "less susceptible to errors" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "less prone to defects" or "not prone to defects"?

"Less prone to defects" implies a reduced likelihood, while "not prone to defects" suggests a complete absence, which is often unrealistic. Thus, "less prone to defects" is usually more accurate.

What's the difference between "less prone to defects" and "defect-free"?

"Less prone to defects" indicates a lower probability of defects, while "defect-free" implies no defects are present. "Defect-free" is a stronger claim and should only be used when there is a high degree of certainty.