less privilege for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less privilege for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the reduction of privileges or advantages granted to a particular group or individual. Example: "The new policy aims to create a more equitable environment by advocating for less privilege for those in positions of power."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

As a white male, I hold privilege, and I ought to use my privilege to leverage people with less privilege for equality.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Users with less privileges are given higher (overline{k}), while the value of k is constant.

Journal of Big Data

"More competition also means more opening, more space for the young," Mr. Monti said, adding that the changes would create less space for "privilege and more recognition for merit".

The New York Times

It simply makes no sense for some people to pay substantially less for the privilege of driving their vehicles onto one of the most congested islands on earth simply because they are coming from New Jersey.

The New York Times

WHILE a small plane pays less for the privilege of using the airport, it can actually take up extra time taking off and landing.

The New York Times

And if investors want to give money to a bond manager, why not to the likes of Pimco, which would charge a lot less for the privilege?All this is happening at a time when there is still debate on the economic benefits of the industry.

The Economist

But, right now, Apple is charging a little less for the privilege.

TechCrunch

"This is a big privilege for Staten Island.

The New York Times - Arts

It's a privilege for me to encounter that".

The New York Times

Currently, the patent holder keeps the privilege for 14 years.

The New York Times

"It was such a privilege for me.

Los Angeles Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When advocating for social change, use "less privilege for" to clearly and directly address the need for equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. For example, "The organization advocates for less privilege for the wealthy to create a more level playing field for everyone."

Common error

Avoid using "less privilege for" in contexts where the goal is equality of outcome rather than equality of opportunity. The phrase implies reducing existing advantages, whereas some situations might require actively boosting those who are disadvantaged.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less privilege for" functions as a modifier, often used to advocate for changes in social or political systems to promote fairness. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

25%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "less privilege for" is a grammatically correct phrase used to advocate for reducing advantages held by certain groups in order to promote greater equity. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for use in various contexts, particularly news and media, and science. While the phrase is relatively rare, understanding its nuances is vital for clear and effective communication on topics of social justice. When using this phrase, consider alternative expressions such as "reduced advantages for" or "decreased entitlements for" to fine-tune your message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reduced advantages for

This alternative emphasizes the reduction of advantages rather than the abstract concept of privilege.

restricted privileges for

Highlights the limitations imposed on certain privileges.

decreased entitlements for

This phrase highlights a decrease in what is considered due or deserved.

fewer benefits for

Focuses on the tangible benefits that are being diminished.

curtailed advantages for

Indicates that advantages have been cut back or reduced.

diminished preferential treatment for

This specifies that the preferential treatment is being reduced.

unequal opportunity for

This emphasizes the absence of equal opportunity instead of directly addressing privilege.

lack of advantages for

Shifts the focus to the absence of advantages.

limited access for

Highlights restricted access to resources or opportunities.

disadvantaged position for

Emphasizes the unfavorable position someone is in compared to others.

FAQs

How can I use "less privilege for" in a sentence?

You can use "less privilege for" to advocate for fairness. For example, "The new policy aims to create a more equitable environment by advocating for "less privilege for" those in positions of power".

What is a good alternative to "less privilege for"?

Alternatives include "reduced advantages for", "decreased entitlements for", or "fewer benefits for", depending on the specific context.

What does it mean to advocate for "less privilege for" a certain group?

Advocating for "less privilege for" a group means supporting policies or changes that reduce the advantages or preferential treatment that group currently receives, with the goal of promoting greater equity.

Is "less privilege for" the same as advocating for equality?

While advocating for "less privilege for" often contributes to equality, it specifically focuses on reducing existing advantages. True equality involves ensuring everyone has equal opportunities and access, which may require more than just reducing privilege for some.