less need for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less need for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in contexts where something has decreased in necessity, or when one is expressing the idea of needing less of something. For example: "With the new technology, there is less need for manual labor."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

So less need for the SPF 30,000 sun cream.

The Guardian

In winnowing stocks, they therefore have less need for shortcuts.

The New York Times

I see less and less need for government.

The New York Times

With lower deficits, it would have less need for borrowing.

The New York Times

There is also less need for regulatory change.

The Economist

The longer bats last, the less need for new ones.

The New York Times - Sports

They have less need for the watchful eyes of a manager.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Personally, I find less need for antihistamines if I consume organically oriented food.

Harvard University

The result, of course, is less need for managers and less opportunity for promotions.

The Guardian

With less demand for the securities, there would be less need for dollars.

The New York Times

By improving primary and community care, patients will have less need for costly hospital beds.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less need for", ensure the context clearly indicates what the reduced need is in relation to. For example, "With the new software, there is "less need for" manual data entry".

Common error

Avoid using "less need for" without specifying what the need is being compared to. Saying "There is "less need for" intervention" is vague. Instead, specify: "There is "less need for" intervention now that the policy is in place".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less need for" functions as a determiner phrase modifying a noun, indicating a reduction in the necessity or requirement of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and widely usable in English. It's primary role is to highlight a decreased requirement.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

28%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "less need for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate a reduction in the necessity or requirement of something. As Ludwig AI validates, it is broadly accepted and used in diverse contexts, including news, science, and academia. The phrase functions as a determiner modifying a noun, clearly conveying that a previous necessity has diminished. When using "less need for", ensure you clearly specify the subject being compared to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "reduced requirement for" and "decreased necessity for" can add nuance depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reduced requirement for

Emphasizes the diminished necessity from a requirement standpoint.

decreased necessity for

Highlights a decline in the essential nature or importance.

diminished demand for

Focuses on a lower level of request or desire for something.

less reliance on

Indicates a decreased dependence on something else.

reduced dependence on

Highlights a decreased reliance or dependence.

lower requirement of

Stresses that a lighter constraint is in place.

decreased reliance on

More explicit on the aspect of reducing dependence.

less obligation for

Highlights a reduced duty or responsibility.

weakened imperative for

Suggests that the driving force behind something has lost impact.

less call for

Highlights that there is no longer an emergency or a request for something.

FAQs

How can I use "less need for" in a sentence?

Use "less need for" to indicate a reduction in the necessity of something. For example, "With renewable energy sources, there's "less need for" fossil fuels".

What are some alternatives to "less need for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "reduced requirement for", "decreased necessity for", or "diminished demand for", depending on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "less need for"?

Yes, "less need for" is grammatically correct and commonly used to express a decreased requirement or necessity.

What's the difference between "less need for" and "lower need for"?

"Less need for" and "lower need for" are often interchangeable, but "less need for" might subtly suggest a more significant reduction. For instance, "With automation, there is "less need for" manual labor", while "With the new system, there's a "lower need for" overtime".