less manpower intensive

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less manpower intensive" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing tasks, processes, or projects that require fewer human resources or labor to complete. Example: "The new automated system is less manpower intensive, allowing us to allocate our staff to more critical tasks."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

GP7: "I mean it's very much less manpower intensive not using paper records", GP12: "I think generally being paperless is better, and all the information's is on the computer, so you can get hold of stuff", "...sometimes you can get hold of other records more quickly.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Israel's military, long a unifying social institution, not only needed to counter new dangers from states such as Iraq and Iran (which both had long-range missiles) but also had to face the difficulties of changing to a more technical, less manpower-intensive force.

Encyclopedia Britannica

There's more CCTV, less manpower," said one practitioner.

The Guardian

Automation means manufacturing requires less manpower than before.

The Guardian

By comparison, trusts and estates work requires far less manpower, which mean far less profit.

The New York Times

"The capability that I am providing comes at less manpower on the ground," General North said.

The New York Times

For a start, the UN has far less manpower than the US.

The Guardian

The lean model bodes well for companies like Leap2 that hope to become power players with much less manpower.

The New York Times

The UK, hoping to build on the American experience, is looking to build something less cumbersome, more efficient, requiring less manpower and much more destructive.

The Guardian

And apparently it's one that requires much less manpower.

TechCrunch

ORC requires less manpower in operation but has higher investment costs.

Energy, Sustainability and Society

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In business proposals or reports, use "less manpower intensive" to showcase cost-saving benefits associated with automation or streamlined operations.

Common error

While "less manpower intensive" is technically correct, it can sound overly formal or jargonistic in casual conversations. Opt for simpler alternatives like "easier" or "less work" when communicating with a general audience.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less manpower intensive" functions as a descriptive adjective phrase. It modifies a noun, indicating that the noun requires fewer human resources or less manual labor. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

32%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "less manpower intensive" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to describe processes or systems that require reduced human labor. As Ludwig AI confirms, its application spans across diverse domains, including science, news, and encyclopedias. It's crucial to consider context when using it. While technically correct, it is better suited to professional, formal, or technical writing, but it might be perceived as unnecessarily formal in casual communication. Alternative phrases, such as "less labor intensive", offer gender-neutral options without sacrificing clarity. The term indicates efficiency, cost-saving benefits, and technological advancement which is often associated with reducing reliance on manual labor.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

less labor intensive

Replaces "manpower" with "labor", offering a more gender-neutral alternative while retaining the core meaning.

less workforce dependent

Substitutes "manpower intensive" with "workforce dependent", emphasizing reliance on a workforce.

requiring fewer personnel

Rephrases the concept to focus on the number of people needed, using more formal vocabulary.

less employee intensive

Uses "employee" instead of "manpower" making it more specific to employee roles within a company.

less human resource intensive

Replaces "manpower" with the more formal term "human resource", suitable for business contexts.

less staff intensive

Uses "staff" instead of "manpower", which is a more general term for workers.

automation-driven

Highlights the role of automation in reducing the need for human labor.

technology-driven

Emphasizes the role of technology in reducing the need for human labor.

lean staffing model

Refers to a business strategy that minimizes the number of employees required.

requiring minimal staffing

Focuses on the reduced amount of staff needed for a particular task or operation.

FAQs

How can I use "less manpower intensive" in a sentence?

You can use "less manpower intensive" to describe a process or technology that requires fewer human workers. For example: "The new software makes the process "less manpower intensive" than before".

What's a gender-neutral alternative to "less manpower intensive"?

A gender-neutral alternative is "less labor intensive". Both phrases convey the same meaning, but "labor" is a non-gendered term.

Is "less manpower intensive" appropriate for all types of writing?

While grammatically correct, "less manpower intensive" is more suitable for formal or technical writing. In casual settings, consider using simpler terms like "easier" or "more efficient".

What does it mean for a process to be "less manpower intensive"?

It means the process requires fewer people to complete. This can be due to automation, better tools, or streamlined workflows. If a company adopts a system that is ""less manpower intensive"" it would likely save money.