less impressive for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less impressive for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is not as impressive in comparison to something else or in a specific context. Example: "The new smartphone is less impressive for its battery life compared to its predecessor."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

20 human-written examples

But it is no less impressive for that.

The Guardian

Results were less impressive for Detroit's other automakers.

The New York Times

That's not to say the views are any less impressive for those riding in economy.

The Guardian - Travel

But Joel Wagonfeld, an analyst with Banc of America Securities, said Dell's earnings were no less impressive for their consistency.

The New York Times

The building that is said to be the earliest surviving Christian "house of the church" was much less impressive, for good reason.

The New York Times - Science

She's grown or been assembled into a precious object, gliding through the show with a beauty that's no less impressive for looking vacuum-sealed.

The New York Times - Arts

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

39 human-written examples

Results are less impressive than for terbinafine, but there are no potential side-effects.

The Guardian - Travel

It may be less impressive, but for the vast majority of computer users, that's the sort of cybercrime they should spend more of their time defending against.

The Guardian - Tech

The gain is therefore less impressive than for the previous results.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Less impressive results for CTC in two other multi-institutional screening trials may be attributable to inadequate reader training and other study design differences.

Cancer Imaging

And it's no less impressive or moving for that - as the body casts help to show.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less impressive for", clearly specify the aspect or comparison group that makes the subject less impressive. This provides context and strengthens your statement. For example, "While the design is modern, the phone is "less impressive for" its battery life compared to its competitors."

Common error

Avoid using "less impressive for" without a clear point of comparison. Saying something is "less impressive for" no reason can confuse the reader. Always specify what makes it less impressive or what it is being compared to, for instance, saying "The results are "less impressive for" a study of this scale."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less impressive for" functions as a qualifier, diminishing the perceived impact or effectiveness of something in a particular context or when compared to something else. It indicates a relative lack of impressiveness, specifying the reason or circumstance contributing to this reduction. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "less impressive for" functions as a qualifier, diminishing the perceived impact or effectiveness of something in a particular context. Ludwig AI confirms the grammatical correctness of the phrase, which finds use in news, academic, and professional settings. While semantically similar alternatives like "not as striking for" and "less remarkable in" offer subtle variations, the key lies in specifying what makes the subject less impressive. The phrase is generally appropriate for neutral to professional registers. Given the lack of examples, it is not possible to determine if there are specific authoritative sources that employ this phrase frequently, or if usage patterns depend on specific registers. Based on available information, the phrase is grammatically correct.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not as striking for

Replaces "impressive" with "striking", focusing on the visual impact. This alternative changes the emphasis from general impressiveness to visual appeal.

less outstanding in

Substitutes "impressive" with "outstanding", focusing on the lack of exceptional quality in a particular regard.

less remarkable in

Substitutes "impressive for" with "remarkable in", highlighting the lack of distinction or noteworthiness in a specific aspect.

not quite as effective for

Replaces "impressive" with "effective", focusing on a reduction in functional performance or suitability for a task.

not as noteworthy for

Substitutes "impressive" with "noteworthy", focusing on the lack of remarkable qualities or significance in a specific aspect.

less significant in

Replaces "impressive" with "significant", shifting the focus to importance or consequence in a specific area.

not as powerful for

Replaces "impressive" with "powerful", highlighting a reduction in strength or impact in a given situation.

not so compelling in

Uses "compelling" instead of "impressive", implying a lack of persuasiveness or captivation in a given context.

less imposing in

Uses "imposing" instead of "impressive", implying a reduced sense of grandeur or authority in a certain aspect.

less influential on

Shifts the focus from general impressiveness to the degree of influence exerted in a specific context.

FAQs

How can I use "less impressive for" in a sentence?

Use "less impressive for" to indicate that something is not as remarkable or effective in a particular aspect or when compared to something else. For example, "The movie's plot was engaging, but the special effects were "less impressive for" a blockbuster film."

What are some alternatives to "less impressive for"?

You can use alternatives such as "not as striking for", "less remarkable in", or "less significant in" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "less impressive for" or "not as impressive"?

Both "less impressive for" and "not as impressive" are grammatically correct. "Less impressive for" is used when you want to specify a reason or a context for the reduced impressiveness, while "not as impressive" is a more general comparison.

What does it mean when something is described as "less impressive for" a certain reason?

When something is described as "less impressive for" a specific reason, it means that its impact or quality is diminished in light of that particular context or comparison. The specified reason provides the basis for the reduced perception of impressiveness.