less important for

USAGE SUMMARY

"less important for" is correct and can be used in written English.
For example, "Technology is less important for understanding history than it is for predicting the future."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It is no less important for that.

The Economist

They are no less important for that.

The Guardian

Is college attendance less important for them?

The New York Times - Sports

It's politically less important for legislators from the city".

The New York Times

But perhaps it's less important for Mr. Clayton.

The New York Times - Arts

Material strength failure is less important for most cases.

International Journal of Solids and Structures

In proposing change there were arguments which were familiar but none the less important for that.

The Guardian

Fine-tuning definitions, however, is less important for the future than identifying and neutralizing fascist threats.

The New York Times - Books

He also bought works by painters he considered less important, for educational purposes.

The New York Times - Travel

Of NATO, he said that "the cooperation is no less important for them than for us".

The New York Times

Storytelling skills may be less important for the early literacy skills of most children.

University of California, Berkeley

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less important for", ensure that the comparison is clear. Specify what the subject is less important for, and, if relevant, what it is more important for. This provides context and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "less important for" without specifying the context. Vague statements can lead to misinterpretations. Always clarify the specific area or aspect where the subject is less important.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less important for" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or verb, indicating a reduced level of significance or relevance in relation to something else. As Ludwig indicates, the phrase is used correctly.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Academia

4%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "less important for" is a prepositional phrase used to indicate a reduced level of significance or relevance in a specific context. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound and frequently employed across various domains. It's vital to ensure clarity and context when using this phrase to avoid vagueness. Common alternatives include "not as crucial for" and "less relevant to". The phrase sees frequent use in Science and News & Media sources. Therefore, when employing "less important for", clarity is key to precise communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

less relevant to

Suggests a weaker connection or applicability.

not as crucial for

Emphasizes a lower level of criticality or necessity.

less critical for

Indicates a reduced degree of necessity or urgency.

not as essential to

Highlights that something is not a requirement.

of lesser significance to

Highlights a reduced level of importance or consequence.

not as vital for

Indicates that something is not as essential or indispensable.

of reduced importance to

Formally states that something holds a lower degree of relevance.

secondary to

Shows that something is of lower priority.

subsidiary to

Indicates that something is secondary or subordinate.

not a priority for

Highlights a lack of precedence or urgency.

FAQs

How can I use "less important for" in a sentence?

Use "less important for" to indicate that something has a diminished significance or relevance in a specific context. For example, "Experience might be "less important for" entry-level positions."

What are some alternatives to saying "less important for"?

You can use phrases such as "not as crucial for", "less relevant to", or "of lesser significance to" depending on the specific meaning you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "less important for"?

Yes, "less important for" is grammatically correct and widely used in English to indicate a reduced level of importance or relevance.

When should I use "less important for" versus "not important for"?

"Less important for" implies a relative difference in importance, while "not important for" suggests a complete lack of importance in a specific context. Choose the phrase that accurately reflects the degree of significance.