less huge

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less huge" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is smaller in size or magnitude compared to something else that is considered huge. Example: "The new building is less huge than the original design, making it more suitable for the neighborhood."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

And yes, I have observed the phenomenon it satirizes, though in my experience such groups tend to be less huge, both collectively and individually.

The New York Times

"He made a huge price increase, rode through the resulting controversy, and now has settled in to taking a less huge price increase, but probably still very big price increase.

The Guardian - Music

One critic said on Amazon that he wished the book had included more tips on differentiating between huge and less huge ships, so readers could be sure "what size of ship they were avoiding".

The New York Times - Books

They sang along to his songs, from super hits like "Billy Jean" and "Thriller," to only slightly less huge jams like "Beat It".

Vice

China is huge and Australia is less huge (if we all moved to China we'd make up less than two-precent of their population) and the agreement ensures that our economic future is very much intertwined with the fluctuations of their economy.

Vice

Also, sometimes rolling up the sleeves on a long sleeve shirt makes it look cooler, and it also can make the shirt look less huge on you.

WikiHow

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

In the case of the second and third killeroo images, the running time was considerably less because huge parts of the scene were not expanded.

Stanford University

In a telephone news conference from London Thursday, Alan Wurtzel, NBC's top research executive, said, "The numbers for archery have been nothing less than huge".

The New York Times

Kumar uses his close reading of modern history to clarify many confusions by those who, still believing that facts speak for themselves, none the less make huge theoretical or ideological presuppositions.

The Guardian - Books

We were not clear enough about the £6,000 maximum and not clear enough that, from the beginning, everybody would be paying less and huge numbers of people would be paying nothing, whereas now they are paying something.

The Guardian

Clearly, Web video has a long way to go before it rivals search marketing, much less the huge numbers racked up by television advertising.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less huge", ensure the context clearly establishes what is being compared. For instance, 'The revised budget was "less huge" than initially projected, making it more palatable to stakeholders'.

Common error

Avoid using "less huge" when a more precise measurement is available. Saying 'the room is "less huge"' is vague; stating 'the room is 20 square feet smaller' provides clearer information.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less huge" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, modifying a noun by indicating that it possesses a smaller degree of hugeness compared to something else. Ludwig examples demonstrate its use in comparing sizes, quantities, or magnitudes.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

17%

Academia

8%

Less common in

Science

8%

Formal & Business

8%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "less huge" is a grammatically sound phrase used to describe something that is smaller in size or magnitude compared to something else that is considered huge. While correct, it's less common than alternatives like "smaller" or "not as large". Ludwig's analysis, confirms that this phrase is acceptable for use in various contexts, particularly in news and media. When using "less huge", ensure clarity in comparison, avoiding vagueness. Remember, according to Ludwig, the phrase is generally appropriate for neutral contexts, making it a versatile choice for various writing scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not as huge

This alternative uses a more common comparative structure to express a smaller degree of hugeness.

smaller in size

This phrase directly replaces "less huge" with a more descriptive and common expression of size comparison.

not as large

This uses "large" instead of "huge", providing a slightly different nuance while maintaining the same meaning.

moderately large

This suggests a size that is significant but not at the extreme end of being huge.

somewhat smaller

This emphasizes the reduced size compared to something else.

not quite so big

This uses a more informal tone to convey a similar meaning.

of reduced magnitude

This offers a more formal and abstract way of expressing a smaller scale.

on a smaller scale

This focuses on the scale of something being smaller, implying a reduction in overall size or impact.

comparatively small

This highlights the smallness of something when compared to something else that is huge.

not overwhelmingly large

This emphasizes the absence of being overwhelmingly big, suggesting a more manageable size.

FAQs

How can I use "less huge" in a sentence?

You can use "less huge" to compare the size or magnitude of two things, indicating that one is smaller than the other, especially when both are still considerably large. For example, "The second donation, while significant, was "less huge" than the first".

What are some alternatives to saying "less huge"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "smaller", "not as large", "moderately large", or "of reduced magnitude" to convey that something is not as big as something else. For example, "The revised project scope is "not as large" as originally planned".

Is it grammatically correct to say "less huge"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. "Less" is a comparative adjective used to indicate a smaller quantity or degree of something, and "huge" is an adjective describing something of great size. Combining them is acceptable to show a relative comparison.

Which is more appropriate, "smaller" or "less huge"?

While both are grammatically sound, "smaller" is generally more direct and commonly used for size comparisons. "Less huge" might be used to emphasize that something is still substantially large, but not as large as something else. The choice depends on the nuance you want to convey.