less funds

USAGE SUMMARY

"less funds" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a smaller amount of money than exists or is available. For example: "The organization has less funds this year due to budget cuts."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

For Twitter, that means less funds to invest in things like research and hiring.

The New Yorker

Reduced saving means less funds for capital accumulation, which in turn impedes economic growth.

The New York Times

"We have to make sure the insurance fund is sound, but the board also understands that if we charge banks more, they have less funds to lend".

The New York Times

With all these extra costs, franchisees are more likely to have a smaller profit margin than the corporate store and, thus, less funds to use for a pay hike.

The Guardian - Business

There are myriad reasons why the Westchester County Department of Social Services has less funds and fewer employees and fewer open cases to help families than it did 10 years ago.

The New York Times

Banks are arguing that being required to hold more capital will mean they have less funds to lend to businesses and that the price of loans will have to rise.

The Guardian - Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

38 human-written examples

"One can still do very interesting things with less funding, even with far less funding, and I'm certainly prepared to look at it".

The New York Times - Arts

Non-profit organisations are having to do more with less staff and less funding.

The Economist

And Marine Corps units, other than those preparing for duty in Afghanistan, are getting 30 percent less funding.

The New York Times

"It's not like anyone is saying he's for less funding for education.

The New York Times

Is he concerned the companies under review might be asked to do more with less funding?

The Guardian - Music

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing financial limitations, clarify the specific area or project affected by the "less funds" to provide context and avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "We have less funds", specify "We have less funds for marketing this quarter".

Common error

Avoid using "less funds" without specifying what the funds were intended for. Saying "The project suffered from less funds" is vague. Instead, explain what couldn't be done due to the decreased budget, such as "The project suffered from less funds, resulting in fewer research personnel being hired".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less funds" primarily functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object of a verb or preposition to indicate a reduced quantity of monetary resources. It describes a state of having a smaller amount of money available, similar to examples available on Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

28%

Wiki

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

4%

Social Media

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "less funds" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase that indicates a reduced quantity of monetary resources. As Ludwig examples demonstrate, it's most frequently encountered in news and scientific contexts. To use it effectively, provide specific context about what activities are affected by the reduced funding, avoiding vagueness. Consider alternatives like "reduced funding" or "lower budget" to vary your language. According to Ludwig AI, the expression is valid and useful in written English. Being clear about the implications of "less funds" will enhance your communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reduced funding

Emphasizes the act of reducing the amount of funding available, rather than simply having less.

fewer resources

Broader term referring to any type of resource, not exclusively monetary.

lower budget

Focuses on the financial plan, indicating a decrease in the allocated amount.

scarcer capital

Highlights the limited availability of capital, implying difficulty in obtaining funds.

decreased financial support

More formal and explicit, emphasizing the reduction in monetary assistance.

limited financial resources

Highlights that there is a limitation of existing monetary resource.

tightened budget

Conveys the idea of a budget made smaller by external economic force.

budget constraints

Highlights the limitations being placed on the budget, especially because of economical needs.

financial shortfall

Implies there is a lack of expected funding to satisfy needs.

cutbacks in funding

Focuses on specific reductions that occurred, emphasizing the action taken to reduce funding.

FAQs

How can I use "less funds" in a sentence?

You can use "less funds" to indicate a reduced amount of money available for a specific purpose. For example, "Due to the economic downturn, the department now has "less funds" for research and development".

What are some alternatives to saying "less funds"?

Alternatives include "reduced funding", "fewer resources", or a "lower budget" depending on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to use "less funds"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. While "fewer" is typically used with countable nouns, "less" can be used with uncountable nouns or when referring to a total amount, such as money. Ludwig AI confirms the expression is correct and usable.

What's the difference between "less funds" and "fewer funds"?

While "funds" can be seen as countable, "less funds" is generally accepted when referring to the overall amount of money available. "Fewer funds" is also grammatically correct, but "less funds" is more commonly used in general discourse.