Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
less errors for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'less errors for' is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it as part of a sentence to show a comparison between two things, such as the amount of errors that a particular person might make. For example: 'John makes less errors for his age than most of his classmates.'.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
However, when compared with LOD, GML yields less errors for high watermark amplitudes and thus provides better decoding performance.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
The root-mean-square error shows that it is possible to achieve 10% or less error for the latter case.
Actually the polyp size is estimated by practitioner's experience with more or less error for one practitioner to another.
Figure 5D shows that the length-priority method makes consistently less error on the amacrine cell geometry, in contrast to the convergence of the Purkinje cell, shown in Fig. 5E, where the four-classes method generates less error for all numbers of trips.
These models are more precise than Gompertz and Weibull and show less error for this data set.
Science
It can be seen in Figure (4C and 4D) that when parameter K increases, K can be estimated with less error for any particular value of linear parameter V.
Science
(Plenty of polls predicted a victory for Brexit – and there are many reasons to assume the tapestry of state and national US polls is less error-prone than for a simple majority referendum).
News & Media
After the strand bias test, less than six errors for every 1000 reference sites remained for HCV run 2, while less than four errors for every 1000 reference sites remained for HCV run 1.
Science
Performance on the deviant detection task was nearly perfect for all subjects, with less than 1% errors for any subject.
Science
It appears that only two tetranucleotide based methods (oli.chi2 and signature) present satisfying results – less than 30% of errors – for HT detection in these conditions.
Science
Modality differences were found in the less eccentric condition: more errors for visually than acoustically triggered saccades were made.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When comparing different methods or systems, use "less errors for" to clearly indicate which one produces fewer mistakes in a specific context.
Common error
Remember that "less" is generally used for uncountable nouns, while "fewer" is used for countable nouns. Although "errors" are countable, "less errors for" is an idiomatic expression; be mindful of using "fewer" in contexts where individual errors are emphasized.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "less errors for" functions as a comparative, indicating a reduction in the number of mistakes within a defined context or when comparing different methods or systems. This is supported by Ludwig, which shows examples primarily within scientific and news domains.
Frequent in
Science
50%
News & Media
37%
Formal & Business
13%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "less errors for" is a grammatically correct way to express a comparison showing a reduction in mistakes within a specific context. As Ludwig AI points out, it is deemed acceptable in written English. While the phrase may not be as common as alternatives, it effectively communicates improved accuracy and efficiency. Found mainly in scientific and news sources, it maintains a neutral to professional tone. To enhance clarity or formality, consider alternatives such as "fewer mistakes in", "reduced error rate in", or "improved accuracy in". The context dictates the best choice.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
fewer mistakes in
Replaces "errors" with "mistakes" and uses the preposition "in" instead of "for".
reduced error rate in
Uses "error rate" which is a formal term, and uses the preposition "in" instead of "for".
lower incidence of errors in
Employs more formal vocabulary like "incidence" and uses "in" instead of "for".
improved accuracy in
Focuses on the positive aspect of accuracy rather than the negative aspect of errors and use "in" instead of "for".
better results with fewer errors
Highlights improved outcomes alongside reduced errors.
less faulty in
Uses a different way to express lack of errors, replacing "errors" with "faulty" and use "in" instead of "for".
not as many mistakes for
A more casual way of saying "less errors for" and replace "errors" with "mistakes".
smaller number of errors in
Rephrases the concept using "number of errors" and use "in" instead of "for".
diminished mistakes for
Replace "errors" with "mistakes" and use diminished to show errors reduction.
negligible faults for
Replace "errors" with "faults" and show almost no error.
FAQs
How can I use "less errors for" in a sentence?
You can use "less errors for" to compare the frequency of mistakes in different situations. For example: "This new software produces "less errors for" complex calculations than the old one."
Is "less errors for" grammatically correct?
Yes, "less errors for" is grammatically correct, though it might sound slightly informal to some. While "fewer" is typically used with countable nouns like errors, "less" is acceptable in many comparative contexts.
What's a more formal alternative to "less errors for"?
A more formal alternative would be phrases like "lower error rate in", "reduced incidence of errors for", or "improved accuracy in", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
What is the difference between "less errors" and "less errors for"?
"Less errors" generally refers to a smaller quantity of mistakes. Adding "for" specifies the context or the group to which the reduced error rate applies, such as "less errors for a specific task".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested