Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

less errors for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'less errors for' is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it as part of a sentence to show a comparison between two things, such as the amount of errors that a particular person might make. For example: 'John makes less errors for his age than most of his classmates.'.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

However, when compared with LOD, GML yields less errors for high watermark amplitudes and thus provides better decoding performance.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The root-mean-square error shows that it is possible to achieve 10% or less error for the latter case.

Actually the polyp size is estimated by practitioner's experience with more or less error for one practitioner to another.

Figure 5D shows that the length-priority method makes consistently less error on the amacrine cell geometry, in contrast to the convergence of the Purkinje cell, shown in Fig. 5E, where the four-classes method generates less error for all numbers of trips.

These models are more precise than Gompertz and Weibull and show less error for this data set.

Science

BMC Cancer

It can be seen in Figure (4C and 4D) that when parameter K increases, K can be estimated with less error for any particular value of linear parameter V.

(Plenty of polls predicted a victory for Brexit – and there are many reasons to assume the tapestry of state and national US polls is less error-prone than for a simple majority referendum).

News & Media

The Guardian

After the strand bias test, less than six errors for every 1000 reference sites remained for HCV run 2, while less than four errors for every 1000 reference sites remained for HCV run 1.

Performance on the deviant detection task was nearly perfect for all subjects, with less than 1% errors for any subject.

Science

Plosone

It appears that only two tetranucleotide based methods (oli.chi2 and signature) present satisfying results – less than 30% of errors – for HT detection in these conditions.

Science

Plosone

Modality differences were found in the less eccentric condition: more errors for visually than acoustically triggered saccades were made.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing different methods or systems, use "less errors for" to clearly indicate which one produces fewer mistakes in a specific context.

Common error

Remember that "less" is generally used for uncountable nouns, while "fewer" is used for countable nouns. Although "errors" are countable, "less errors for" is an idiomatic expression; be mindful of using "fewer" in contexts where individual errors are emphasized.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less errors for" functions as a comparative, indicating a reduction in the number of mistakes within a defined context or when comparing different methods or systems. This is supported by Ludwig, which shows examples primarily within scientific and news domains.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

37%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "less errors for" is a grammatically correct way to express a comparison showing a reduction in mistakes within a specific context. As Ludwig AI points out, it is deemed acceptable in written English. While the phrase may not be as common as alternatives, it effectively communicates improved accuracy and efficiency. Found mainly in scientific and news sources, it maintains a neutral to professional tone. To enhance clarity or formality, consider alternatives such as "fewer mistakes in", "reduced error rate in", or "improved accuracy in". The context dictates the best choice.

FAQs

How can I use "less errors for" in a sentence?

You can use "less errors for" to compare the frequency of mistakes in different situations. For example: "This new software produces "less errors for" complex calculations than the old one."

Is "less errors for" grammatically correct?

Yes, "less errors for" is grammatically correct, though it might sound slightly informal to some. While "fewer" is typically used with countable nouns like errors, "less" is acceptable in many comparative contexts.

What's a more formal alternative to "less errors for"?

A more formal alternative would be phrases like "lower error rate in", "reduced incidence of errors for", or "improved accuracy in", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What is the difference between "less errors" and "less errors for"?

"Less errors" generally refers to a smaller quantity of mistakes. Adding "for" specifies the context or the group to which the reduced error rate applies, such as "less errors for a specific task".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: