less efficient for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less efficient for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the efficiency of different methods, processes, or systems in a specific context. Example: "Using manual data entry can be less efficient for large datasets compared to automated systems."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I'm going to tell you guys to maybe be less efficient for a while.

Harvard Business Review

The STORM model corrections are less efficient for lower-middle latitudes and severe geomagnetic storms.

Advances in Space Research

Thirdly, the cooperative strategy is less efficient for targets with larger spacecraft mass.

Advances in Space Research

The monolayer formation is also less efficient for double-stranded versus single-stranded DNA.

Analytica Chimica Acta

In contrast, crossing controls is less efficient for estimating a slope parameter for the treatment effect.

Controlled Clinical Trials

Iron-based sorbents, although less efficient for H2S removal, permit significant amounts of elemental sulfur to be formed during regeneration.

Catalysis Today

Cecal digestion is less efficient for digesting grasses than ruminant digestion, but zebras compensate by ingesting more forage than do ruminants.

Britannica

We also apply the algebraic "girdle" method, which is much less efficient for calculations by hand for moderately large representations.

Annals of Physics

Similarly, adding more taxis in an urban area can slow not just cabs but all traffic, making urban driving less efficient for everyone.

The New York Times

"And when they get older their mandibles also wear down, so they are probably less efficient for feeding, but they develop the crystals for defense".

The New York Times - Science

"We want to delight the customer at the doorstep," the participant said, but poor packaging and poor presentation was both irritating to the customer, and less efficient for the delivery firms.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less efficient for", clearly specify what the subject is less efficient for. This provides crucial context and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "less efficient for" without a clear point of comparison. For instance, instead of saying "This method is less efficient", specify "This method is less efficient for processing large datasets than Method X".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less efficient for" primarily functions as a comparative adjective phrase. It modifies a noun or pronoun, indicating that something possesses a lower degree of efficiency in relation to a specific purpose or context. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

68%

News & Media

19%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "less efficient for" is a versatile phrase used to compare the effectiveness of different approaches or methods, as validated by Ludwig AI. It is grammatically correct and commonly used in formal contexts such as science, news, and business. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly specify the context or purpose for which something is less efficient to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "not as effective for" or "less suitable for" can provide nuanced variations in meaning. By following these guidelines, you can use "less efficient for" effectively and accurately in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not as effective for

Replaces "efficient" with "effective", focusing on the outcome rather than the process.

less productive for

Substitutes "efficient" with "productive", emphasizing output and results.

less useful for

Replaces "efficient" with "useful", highlighting the practical value or applicability.

less suitable for

Focuses on appropriateness rather than efficiency, indicating a mismatch in suitability.

not ideal for

Indicates a suboptimal choice, shifting the focus from efficiency to overall desirability.

less appropriate for

Emphasizes the lack of suitability in a given situation.

less effective at

Changes the preposition and replaces "efficient" with "effective", focusing on ability.

not the best choice for

Suggests that there are better alternatives available.

less well-suited to

Highlights the diminished compatibility of something for a specific purpose.

less optimized for

Indicates a deficiency in tailored design or setup for optimal performance.

FAQs

How can I use "less efficient for" in a sentence?

Use "less efficient for" to compare the effectiveness of something in a specific context. For example, "Manual data entry is "less efficient for" large datasets than automated systems".

What are some alternatives to "less efficient for"?

You can use alternatives such as "not as effective for", "less productive for", or "less suitable for" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "less efficient for" or "more inefficient for"?

"Less efficient for" is generally preferred as it is more concise and direct. "More inefficient for" is grammatically correct but can sound redundant.

When is it appropriate to use "less efficient for" in writing?

It's appropriate when comparing two or more methods, processes, or systems and indicating that one performs with lower efficiency than the others under specific conditions or for a particular purpose. For example, "Although effective, this process is "less efficient for" small-scale applications".