less diverse

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less diverse" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation, group, or environment that has a lower level of variety or difference in characteristics, such as culture, ethnicity, or ideas. Example: "The committee's decision resulted in a less diverse panel of experts than we had hoped for."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Less diverse marine fauna.

University of California, Berkeley

Sure, small banks are less diverse.

The New York Times

But has it ever been any less diverse?

The Guardian - Arts

"Our planet becomes less diverse, less interesting," he said.

The New York Times

Most important but unsurprising, activist investors make boards less diverse.

Columbia University

They are less diverse, more evangelical and more agrarian.

The New York Times

Cormorants continue to be common, but are less diverse.

Journal of Human Evolution

Stuyvesant's enrollment has remained constant, with about 3,000 students, but it has become less diverse.

The New York Times

The foundations' top leadership was even less diverse racially and ethnically.

The New York Times

They are the foundation without which nature is always going to be less diverse," says Hilborne.

The Guardian

Jury pools in federal judicial districts are less diverse than the localities where murders are committed.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In scientific contexts, "less diverse" can accurately describe ecosystems or populations with a reduced number of species or genetic variations. Use quantitative data when possible to support your claims.

Common error

Don't assume that "less diverse" automatically equates to negative outcomes. While diversity is often beneficial, consider the specific context and potential trade-offs. Overstating the implications of reduced diversity can weaken your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less diverse" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate a lower degree of variety or heterogeneity. Ludwig AI shows that it is used to compare the diversity of different groups, entities, or time periods.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Science

21%

Academia

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "less diverse" is a versatile and commonly used comparative adjective phrase indicating a reduced level of variety or heterogeneity. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound and frequently employed across diverse domains, including news, science, and academia. To ensure clarity, specify the dimensions of diversity you are referring to and contextualize the implications of reduced diversity. While "less diverse" is generally understood, related phrases like "less heterogeneous" or "lacking diversity" may offer a more precise nuance depending on the context. By being mindful of these considerations, you can effectively use "less diverse" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacking diversity

Directly states the absence of variety.

less heterogeneous

Focuses on the lack of variety in composition or structure.

with reduced variety

Emphasizes a decrease in the range of different things.

less multifarious

Emphasizes the absence of many different types or forms.

less various

Highlights the limited number of different elements or aspects.

less uniform

Indicates a lower degree of sameness or consistency.

less differentiated

Suggests a reduced level of distinction or specialization.

less divergent

Emphasizes the reduced tendency to move in different directions or opinions.

narrower in scope

Focuses on the limited range or extent of something.

more homogeneous

Highlights increased similarity and reduced diversity.

FAQs

What are some synonyms for "less diverse"?

Alternatives include "less heterogeneous", "less multifarious", or "lacking diversity". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it always negative to describe something as "less diverse"?

Not necessarily. While diversity is often valued, there may be situations where reduced diversity is a natural or even desirable outcome. Context is key.

How can I use "less diverse" in a sentence?

Example: "The applicant pool was "less diverse" this year compared to previous years, which raised concerns about equitable representation."

What's the difference between "less diverse" and "not as diverse"?

The phrases are largely interchangeable. "Less diverse" is slightly more concise, while "not as diverse" may sound more conversational.