less costs of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less costs of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate any reduction in costs or expenses. For example, "We achieved greater efficiency and less costs of doing business."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The PAM is theoretically robust (Monke and Pearson 1989), relatively easy to apply, and useful for influencing policy makers, especially in finance ministries because it is easy to understand as it follows the basic calculation, profit = income from sales less costs of production.

Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Hardware companies make money based on retail price less cost of goods sold, minus marketing costs.

TechCrunch

"Your gross return less cost of trading equals your net return.

Forbes

The remarkable benefits of SIC are simplicity, inexpensiveness, portability, ease of use and less cost of routine maintenance.

Chemistry Central Journal

The developed system can guarantee the energy demand of the station (100% reliability) with less cost of energy production.

Energy Conversion and Management

That's striking for a company whose gross profit (sales less cost of goods) over the last 12 months stands at 25% of sales.

Forbes

Therefore, the negligence rule turns out to be superior, if a market relationship between the parties exists, since it incurs less cost of risk.

International Review of Law and Economics

The company, which is locked in a battle with Verizon Communications to acquire MCI, forecast flat revenue in the three months ended March 31 and estimated revenue less cost of sales and general expenditures in the range of $970 million to $990 million.

Forbes

Sales have been compounding at a 15%-a-year rate for the last five years, while the gross profit margin (sales less cost of goods and occupancy) has risen from 27% to 33%.

Forbes

Because of their high value nature and less cost of extraction methods, extraction and use of bioactive compounds from waste pulp as a food additive are gaining interest [8, 9].

Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture

Plants have numerous advantages over the production systems on account of scalability, safety, and are economic; for example, less cost of production is involved for Hepatitis B nucleocapsid antigen using transgenic tobacco.

Omics Technologies and Bio-Engineering Volume 2: Towards Improving Quality of Life

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less costs of", ensure it's clear what the subject of the cost reduction is. For example, specify "less costs of production" or "less costs of operation" for better clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "less costs of" in contexts where it could be misinterpreted as simply "lower costs". Ensure the context clearly implies a comparison or reduction in costs related to a specific activity or item.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less costs of" functions as a modifier, specifying that an action, process, or item results in a reduction of expenses related to it. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is considered grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "less costs of" is a grammatically correct way to indicate a reduction in expenses, though it's not always the most elegant choice. Ludwig AI considers the phrase usable. It is most commonly found in scientific, news, and business contexts, where precise language about financial matters is important. For clearer and more impactful writing, consider alternatives like "lower expenses for" or "reduced expenditure on". When using "less costs of", make sure the context clearly specifies what is benefiting from the cost reduction.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lower expenses for

Replaces "costs" with the synonym "expenses" and uses "for" to indicate the object.

reduced expenditure on

Emphasizes a decrease in spending using "expenditure" instead of "costs".

decreased financial burden of

Highlights the alleviation of a financial load, which implies lower costs.

cheaper options for

Focuses on the availability of more affordable alternatives.

more economical methods for

Suggests the use of approaches that save money and resources.

budget-friendly alternatives to

Highlights alternatives that are easier on the budget.

cost-saving measures for

Focuses on the actions taken to reduce expenses.

more affordable solutions for

Replaces "costs" with "solutions" and suggests that these solutions are cheaper.

leaner spending on

Indicates a reduction in spending through efficiency improvements.

efficient cost management of

Focuses on improvements of process of cost management.

FAQs

How can I use "less costs of" in a sentence?

You can use "less costs of" to indicate a reduction in the expenses associated with something. For example, "Implementing this new technology will result in "less costs of" maintenance".

What are some alternatives to "less costs of"?

Alternatives include "lower expenses for", "reduced expenditure on", or "decreased financial burden of", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "less costs of"?

While grammatically acceptable, "less costs of" is not always the most elegant phrasing. Using alternatives like "lower costs for" or "reduced costs for" can sometimes sound more natural.

How does "less costs of" differ from "lower costs for"?

"Less costs of" implies a reduction in expenses, while "lower costs for" simply indicates that the costs are at a reduced level. The former suggests an action that caused the reduction, while the latter is a statement of fact.