less costly for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less costly for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the financial implications or affordability of something for a specific group or individual. Example: "This new method is less costly for small businesses compared to traditional marketing strategies."

✓ Grammatically correct

Business

Finance

Healthcare

Legal

General Usage

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

51 human-written examples

"It's less costly for the insurance company".

The New York Times

Borrowing and equity financing are then less costly for business.

The New York Times

Diversion may also be less costly for the offender.

Britannica

But cases involving individual discharges are easier and less costly for lawyers to pursue.

The New York Times

It's less costly for a male than flying around," Dr. Lewis said.

The New York Times - Science

"This would be far less costly for the social budgets of member states because it would facilitate integration".

The Guardian

Seasonal changes in demand are also less costly for online retailers because they have a worldwide customer base.

The New York Times - Tech

not just 'Oops, I messed up.' " Metts's attorney urged alternatives that would be less costly for taxpayers.

The New Yorker

He has made it less costly for companies to dismiss people and largely dismantled the nationwide system of collective bargaining.

The New York Times

Lighter regulation makes it less costly for companies to go public but does little to build investor confidence.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Lhakar makes it easier - and less costly - for everyone to participate in activism, thus increasing the long-term costs to the Chinese government.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing costs, clearly specify what is being compared and for whom. For example, instead of saying "it's less costly", specify "outsourcing is less costly for small businesses than hiring in-house staff".

Common error

Avoid using "less costly for" without clearly stating what the alternative or baseline is. Saying "this option is less costly for the company" is vague. Instead, specify "this option is less costly for the company than the previous strategy".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less costly for" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, indicating that something is more economical or affordable for a particular entity. Ludwig examples confirm its use in contexts where cost comparisons are being made.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Academia

10%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "less costly for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used comparative adjective phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its wide applicability across various domains, primarily in News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business contexts. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly specify what is being compared and for whom to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "more affordable for" or "more economical for" to suit the specific context. Avoiding the common error of omitting the comparator will ensure clarity and effectiveness in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

more economical for

Replaces "less costly" with a synonym, focusing on economic efficiency.

more affordable for

Emphasizes accessibility in terms of price.

cheaper for

A simpler, more direct way of saying "less costly".

more budget-friendly for

Highlights the suitability for those with budget constraints.

lower-priced for

Focuses on the reduced price point.

more accessible price-wise for

Specifically addresses financial accessibility.

at a reduced rate for

Indicates a discount or special pricing.

more sustainable financially for

Implies a long-term cost benefit.

a better value proposition for

Highlights the benefits received relative to the cost.

more manageable expenses for

Emphasizes ease of handling financial obligations.

FAQs

How can I use "less costly for" in a sentence?

The phrase "less costly for" indicates that something is more economical for a specific person, group, or entity compared to another option. For example, "Renewable energy is "less costly for" the environment than fossil fuels".

What are some alternatives to "less costly for"?

You can use alternatives like "more affordable for", "cheaper for", or "more economical for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "less costly for" or "least costly for"?

"Less costly for" is used when comparing two options, while "least costly for" is used when identifying the most economical option out of three or more. For example, "This option is less costly for us than that one", vs. "This is the least costly for all options considered".

What's the difference between "less costly for" and "more beneficial for"?

"Less costly for" refers specifically to financial cost, while "more beneficial for" refers to a broader range of benefits, which may or may not include financial savings. A solution can be "less costly for" a company, but a different approach may be "more beneficial for" its employees.