less at stake

USAGE SUMMARY

"less at stake" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to having fewer potential risks or losses in a situation. For example, "Although there is a high degree of competition in the market, there is less at stake for new entrepreneurs."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

52 human-written examples

Now there is less at stake.

The New York Times - Arts

Only Malaysia, which has less at stake biologically, produces more.

Yale University

They simply had less at stake and it showed.

The Guardian - Sport

The average Internet consumers have much less at stake.

The New York Times

But it's also more inviting and less forced, perhaps because there is less at stake here.

The New York Times

People in general might find they have less at stake, and are not so disturbed.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

8 human-written examples

"Theatre is actually more able to do this because there is often less money at stake and less lengthy a development period," he said.

The Guardian

Nothing less is at stake.

The New Yorker

Much less was at stake then, and fewer players were chasing Watson and Simpson.

The New York Times - Sports

In syndication, there is less money at stake than there used to be.

The New York Times

Both sides claim that nothing less is at stake than the future of creative endeavour itself.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "less at stake" when you want to downplay the potential negative outcomes or risks associated with a particular situation or decision. It is particularly effective in contexts where reassurance or a sense of reduced pressure is desired.

Common error

Avoid using "less at stake" to excuse carelessness or inadequate preparation. While it can highlight reduced risk, it should not imply that diligence is unnecessary. Always ensure actions are justified regardless of perceived risk.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less at stake" functions as a descriptor, modifying a situation or decision by indicating a reduced level of risk or potential loss. As Ludwig confirms, it follows standard grammar rules. Examples show it describing scenarios with diminished consequences.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

77%

Academia

5%

Science

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "less at stake" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that describes situations with reduced risk or potential loss. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and appropriateness across various contexts. It's prevalent in news and media and academic discussions, serving to reassure or downplay negative outcomes. When using this phrase, ensure it doesn't excuse negligence but rather highlights a genuine reduction in risk. Consider alternatives like "lower risk" or "reduced consequences" based on the specific situation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

less to lose

Indicates a situation where potential losses are minimal.

lower risk

Focuses specifically on the reduced probability of negative outcomes.

reduced consequences

Highlights the diminished impact of potential actions or events.

less critical

Indicates a decreased level of importance or urgency.

smaller investment

Emphasizes the lower commitment of resources, whether financial or emotional.

not as important

Suggests a diminished significance or relevance.

lower exposure

Suggests a reduced level of vulnerability or involvement.

not as critical

Indicates a decreased level of importance or urgency.

minimal commitment

Highlights the reduced obligation or involvement required.

reduced liability

Focuses on the minimized legal or financial responsibility.

FAQs

How can I use "less at stake" in a sentence?

You can use "less at stake" to describe situations where the potential risks or consequences are reduced. For example, "With the new safety measures in place, there's "less at stake" for the participants."

What's a good alternative to "less at stake"?

Alternatives to "less at stake" include phrases like "lower risk", "reduced consequences", or "not as important", depending on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "less at stake"?

Yes, "less at stake" is grammatically correct and commonly used in English to indicate that there is reduced risk or potential loss in a given situation, as confirmed by Ludwig.

In what contexts is "less at stake" most appropriate?

"Less at stake" is appropriate in contexts where you want to emphasize that the potential negative outcomes are not as significant. This is frequently used in news and media to discuss political situations and formal business to discuss investments.