less advantageous for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less advantageous for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the benefits or advantages of something in relation to a specific subject or context. Example: "This new policy may be less advantageous for small businesses compared to larger corporations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

With three time trials totaling more than 96 kilometers, this year's course was considered to be less advantageous for climbers than in previous races.

The New York Times - Sports

With three time trials totaling about 60 miles, this year's course was considered to be less advantageous for climbers than in previous races.

The New York Times - Sports

Not only do the existing solutions appear to be inadequate to render investment in pharmaceutical R&D profitable, but many of them may become less advantageous for UK companies in the event of a Brexit.

Columbia University

It also provides a strong incentive only for people in high tax brackets, who benefit more because of their higher marginal tax rates, and who tend to itemize because the standard deduction is less advantageous for them.

The New York Times

Those moves would produce "all kinds of synergies," he said, like improving competitiveness, eliminating the incentive to keep foreign profits abroad and making it less advantageous for U.S. companies to relocate.

The New York Times

The practice was routine among the art cognoscenti until almost two years ago, when Senator Charles E. Grassley, the Iowa Republican who was then the committee's chairman, inserted provisions into the Pension Protection Act of 2006 that made partial gifts less advantageous for donors.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

In a brilliant satire, Steven Pearlstein recently put his finger on a central problem: powerful people want one set of rules for themselves and different, less advantageous rules for everyone else.

The New York Times

Those circumstances alone make owning a personal vehicle less advantageous than for individuals who have children and live in the suburbs or a rural area.

Forbes

The more palatable our fruits and vegetables became, however, the less advantageous they were for our health.

The New York Times

The trade-off now comes from users in the third cell of the fixed scheme, who with cluster rotation now are forced to experience less advantageous cluster patterns for the sake of overall network fairness.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

"We were then given the choice of, would we accept technical regulations less advantageous to us, but good for the harmony of Formula One," said Lowdon.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less advantageous for", ensure that you clearly specify what the subject is less advantageous for. Providing a clear context is crucial for effective communication.

Common error

Avoid using "less advantageous for" without clearly stating what the alternative is or what the subject is less advantageous in relation to. Vague comparisons can confuse the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less advantageous for" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, modifying a noun by indicating a reduced level of benefit or suitability. As shown by Ludwig, this phrase highlights a specific drawback or deficiency when compared to an alternative.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

36%

Academia

18%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

6%

Formal & Business

4%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "less advantageous for" serves as a comparative tool to highlight reduced benefits or suitability, as determined by Ludwig's analysis. The phrase is grammatically correct and appears in a variety of contexts, particularly in News & Media and Science. While not exceedingly common, its usage is well-supported by authoritative sources. As Ludwig AI suggests, ensuring clarity by specifying the point of comparison will strengthen your writing. Alternatives like "less beneficial for" or "less favorable for" offer similar meanings, allowing for nuanced expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

less beneficial for

Replaces "advantageous" with a more common synonym, slightly reducing formality.

less favorable for

Substitutes "advantageous" with "favorable", keeping the negative comparison intact.

not as helpful for

Uses a simpler term, "helpful", to convey a similar lack of benefit.

not as useful for

Replaces "advantageous" with "useful", focusing on practicality.

less suitable for

Indicates a reduced level of appropriateness instead of direct advantage.

less well-suited for

Emphasizes the lack of fit or compatibility for a particular purpose.

not ideal for

Highlights the imperfection or sub-optimality of a situation.

disadvantageous for

Uses a stronger, more direct term indicating a negative impact.

less effective for

Focuses on the reduced efficacy or performance.

not the best choice for

Suggests the existence of better options in a given context.

FAQs

What does "less advantageous for" mean?

The phrase "less advantageous for" means something provides fewer benefits or opportunities compared to something else in a specific situation or for a particular purpose. It implies a comparative disadvantage.

How can I use "less advantageous for" in a sentence?

You can use "less advantageous for" to compare options, like: "This strategy might be "less advantageous for" small businesses."

What are some alternatives to "less advantageous for"?

Alternatives include "less beneficial for", "less favorable for", or "not as helpful for", depending on the specific context you want to convey.

Is it better to say "less advantageous for" or "disadvantageous for"?

"Less advantageous for" implies a comparative lack of benefit, while "disadvantageous for" indicates a direct negative impact. Choose the phrase that best reflects the degree of negativity or lack of benefit you wish to express. "Disadvantageous for" is stronger.