less accurately for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less accurately for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a situation where something is not as precise or exact as it could be, particularly in comparison to another method or context. Example: "The data was analyzed less accurately for the second group due to the lack of sufficient samples."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Wiki

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

All participant groups performed less accurately for children's faces than for adults' faces.

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Both models tended to predict yields satisfactorily, but more accurately for maize, intermediate for sorghum and less accurately for sunflower.

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

The model predicts very accurately for the February to November period and less accurately for sowing dates in December and January.

Rice

A few examples will illustrate the point: (i) If subjects are asked to reproduce the duration of either an auditory or a visual stimulus, they can do so very accurately for stimuli which are up to 2 to 3 seconds long, but much less accurately for longer stimuli.

SEP

However, compared to EASE-SS, EASE-MM performed less accurately for mutations in coil residues and for 'small' stability changes.

BMC Genomics

Education can be reported less accurately for female decedents since they are less likely than males to have surviving spouses and are more likely to die at an older age [ 3].

BMC Public Health

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

The M1 peak altitude is less accurately determined for the extended mission, but values are ∼30 km below the M2 peak on average.

Earth, Planets and Space

Rather than the source of a memory for emotional events always being more (or less) accurately recognised than for neutral events, reality monitoring accuracy depends on whether or not the type of affective information encoded helps to distinguish imagery from perception.

Cognition and Emotion

Are consonant clusters slower and less accurately perceived than nonclusters for RD children?

Annals of Dyslexia

Consonant clusters were not slower or less accurately perceived than nonclusters, neither for RD children nor for controls.

Annals of Dyslexia

As such, BW-based allometric scaling may be sufficient to scale adult doses to children for mAbs with linear kinetics except for low weight children, but may less accurately predict pediatric dosing regimens for mAbs that show non-linear kinetics, i.e., that employ TMDD.

CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less accurately for", ensure you clearly state what the comparison is. Provide context to highlight why the accuracy is reduced in that specific scenario.

Common error

Don't use "less accurately for" without specifying the conditions or factors leading to the reduced accuracy. Be specific about what influences the diminished precision.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less accurately for" functions as an adverbial phrase modifying a verb or clause, indicating a comparative degree of accuracy. Ludwig examples show it comparing prediction models, measurement techniques and the recognition of faces or speech.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

80%

Wiki

10%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "less accurately for" is a grammatically correct way to express that something is measured or predicted with reduced precision in a specific context. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase follows standard grammar rules. It's most commonly found in scientific and academic writing, where precise comparisons are essential. When using this phrase, ensure that you clearly define what you are comparing and why the accuracy differs. Consider alternatives like "with reduced accuracy for" or "with lower precision for" to add variety to your writing. Avoiding overgeneralizations will ensure the phrase is used with maximum clarity and impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

with reduced accuracy for

Emphasizes the decrease in accuracy in comparison to another method or situation.

with lower precision for

Focuses on the lack of precision in measurements or predictions.

not as precisely for

Highlights a comparative lack of precision.

to a lesser extent accurately for

Indicates that the accuracy is diminished or limited.

with impaired accuracy for

Suggests that accuracy has been negatively affected or diminished.

with diminished accuracy for

Implies a reduction in the level of accuracy.

not quite as accurately for

Emphasizes that the accuracy is noticeably lower.

somewhat inaccurately for

Indicates a moderate level of inaccuracy.

more approximately for

Highlights that the results are estimations rather than precise measurements.

with more error for

Focuses on the presence of increased errors in the process.

FAQs

How can I use "less accurately for" in a sentence?

You can use "less accurately for" to compare the precision of a method or measurement in different contexts. For example, "The model predicts very accurately for the February to November period and "less accurately for" sowing dates in December and January."

What's a good alternative to "less accurately for"?

Alternatives include "with reduced accuracy for", "with lower precision for", or "not as precisely for", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to use "less accurately for"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. It's used to indicate that something is measured or predicted with a lower degree of precision in a particular situation compared to another.

What does "less accurately for" mean?

It means that the level of precision or correctness is lower in a specific context. It's often used to compare the accuracy of different methods or predictions, implying one is more error-prone than the other.