length enough

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "length enough" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression is "long enough," which is used to indicate that something meets a required or desired length. Example: "The rope is long enough to reach the other side of the river."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

News was presented to you at specific times — morning and evening, or weekly or monthly — and at restricted length, enough to fill a newspaper, magazine or 30-minute broadcast and no more.

The New York Times

The episodes are each a few minutes in length — enough time, say, for Mr. Buffett and his animated acolytes to impart the importance of location when setting up a lemonade stand.

The New York Times

You have length enough of limb by the bounty of your father, and tall stature ungrudgingly transmitted by your mother.

University of Chicago

"No slouches they--the number is 22 digits in length, enough to give every person on the face of the Earth, as well as all those who have lived and died since mankind began, some hundred billion different numbers each...

Los Angeles Times

It doesn't let you go that far – instead, Yarny will simply stop, the line snagged, and you're forced backwards to work out where you might have hooked yourself up wrongly, freeing up length enough to reach the next save point.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

But a stew can be darn near any heterogeneous mixture cooked at length with enough moisture to distinguish it from a braise and not enough moisture to tip it over into soup.

Los Angeles Times

This seems the perfect length, long enough for you to develop your characters and give them room to breathe.

The Guardian

The winning margin of half a length was enough to convince them that no injustice had taken place.

The Guardian - Sport

Not at length, but enough to show that he was engaged and to start to make friends.

The Guardian

If ecologists are involved from the beginning, they can help define the budget, project length (allowing enough time for project-specific research), and performance goals.

Yale University

Not everything is presented at full length, although enough is given so you can decide if you want to hear more.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing dimensions, use "long enough" instead of "length enough" to ensure grammatical correctness. For example, "The rope is long enough to reach the anchor point."

Common error

Avoid using "length enough" in formal writing. This phrase is grammatically incorrect. Instead, use "long enough", "sufficient length", or "adequate length" to maintain clarity and professionalism.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "length enough" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun, attempting to describe whether something meets a specific requirement of dimension. Ludwig AI flags this phrase as not correct in standard written English, suggesting the more conventional "long enough" is preferred.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Academia

40%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "length enough" appears in some contexts, it is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. Ludwig AI identifies it as non-standard, recommending the use of ""long enough"", ""sufficient length"", or ""adequate length"" instead. Although there are limited examples across News & Media, Academia and Wiki sources, the consensus leans towards avoiding this phrase in formal writing to maintain clarity and grammatical accuracy. Thus, writers should opt for grammatically sound alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

long enough

Reverses the word order and replaces "length" with "long", correcting the grammatical structure for standard English.

sufficient length

Replaces "enough" with "sufficient", providing a more formal and grammatically sound alternative.

adequate length

Similar to "sufficient length", this option uses "adequate" to convey the meaning of being sufficient or satisfactory.

length is sufficient

Rephrases the sentence to use a more conventional subject-verb-complement structure.

length is adequate

Uses "adequate" instead of "sufficient" while maintaining a similar level of formality and correctness.

of sufficient length

Emphasizes the quality of length being sufficient, often used in technical or descriptive contexts.

of adequate length

Similar to "of sufficient length", but uses "adequate" to describe the length quality.

extensive enough

Uses "extensive" to describe the length, implying a greater measure of length than "long".

sizeable enough

Replaces "length" with "sizeable" which is similar to "extensive", indicating substantial size or length.

substantial length

Uses "substantial" instead of "sufficient" to emphasize the notable amount of length.

FAQs

Is "length enough" grammatically correct?

No, "length enough" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The correct phrasing is "long enough" or "sufficient length".

What does "length enough" mean, and when can I use it?

While "length enough" is not standard English, it seems to aim to convey that something has sufficient length. It's best to use "long enough" or "sufficient length" instead to avoid grammatical errors.

Are there any formal alternatives to "length enough"?

Yes, formal alternatives include "sufficient length" and "adequate length". These options are more appropriate for academic or professional writing.

How do I use "long enough" correctly in a sentence?

To use "long enough" correctly, place it after the noun or verb it modifies. For example, "The wire is long enough to connect the devices."