Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

led to an increase

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"led to an increase" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used in reference to an increase in something that is the result of something else. For example, "The recent changes in school policy led to an increase in student enrollment."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

An enlarged muscle regeneration time led to an increase of the diaphragmatic twitch-induced pressure.

An increase of either or both parameters led to an increase in the measured responses/properties.

For my business, it has actually led to an increase.

Higher deposition temperatures led to an increase in crystallinity.

A larger MVF led to an increase of BH levels.

Contrary to conventional thinking, the group calving system has not led to an increase in disease.

Portugal's reforms have not – as many predicted – led to an increase in drug use.

This, too, had led to an increase in prices for fishermen.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The more aggressive posture has also led to an increase in civilian casualties.

News & Media

The New Yorker

And there is evidence the policy has led to an increase in audiences for Australian films.

In some cases, the demand has also led to an increase in prices.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "led to an increase", ensure the cause-and-effect relationship is clear and supported by evidence. Providing specific data or context enhances the credibility of your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "led to an increase" without clearly specifying what caused the increase. Vague statements can weaken your argument and confuse the reader. Always provide context and supporting details.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "led to an increase" functions as a causal connector, linking a cause to its effect, where the effect is a rise or growth in something. Ludwig AI confirms that this is correct and widely used in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

38%

News & Media

40%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "led to an increase" is a commonly used phrase that expresses a cause-and-effect relationship, indicating that one thing directly resulted in a rise or growth in another. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use across various domains, especially science, news and media. When using this phrase, it's important to ensure that the causal connection is clear and supported by relevant evidence. Consider using alternatives like "resulted in a growth" or "gave rise to a surge" for variety and precision, depending on the nuances you wish to convey. Being specific about the cause is crucial to avoid vagueness and enhance the clarity of your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "led to an increase" in a sentence?

Use "led to an increase" to show a direct cause-and-effect relationship where something resulted in a rise or growth. For example, "The new marketing campaign "led to an increase" in sales."

What are some alternatives to "led to an increase"?

You can use phrases like "resulted in a growth", "gave rise to a surge", or "contributed to an escalation" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "led to an increase of" or "led to an increase in"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "led to an increase in" is generally preferred and more commonly used. For example, "The new policy "led to an increase in" student enrollment" is more natural than "led to an increase of student enrollment."

What's the difference between "led to an increase" and "resulted in a decrease"?

"Led to an increase" indicates a positive change or growth, while "resulted in a decrease" indicates a negative change or reduction. They are opposite in meaning.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: