Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
led to an increase
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"led to an increase" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used in reference to an increase in something that is the result of something else. For example, "The recent changes in school policy led to an increase in student enrollment."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
An enlarged muscle regeneration time led to an increase of the diaphragmatic twitch-induced pressure.
Science
An increase of either or both parameters led to an increase in the measured responses/properties.
For my business, it has actually led to an increase.
Higher deposition temperatures led to an increase in crystallinity.
A larger MVF led to an increase of BH levels.
Contrary to conventional thinking, the group calving system has not led to an increase in disease.
Academia
Portugal's reforms have not – as many predicted – led to an increase in drug use.
News & Media
This, too, had led to an increase in prices for fishermen.
News & Media
The more aggressive posture has also led to an increase in civilian casualties.
News & Media
And there is evidence the policy has led to an increase in audiences for Australian films.
News & Media
In some cases, the demand has also led to an increase in prices.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "led to an increase", ensure the cause-and-effect relationship is clear and supported by evidence. Providing specific data or context enhances the credibility of your statement.
Common error
Avoid using "led to an increase" without clearly specifying what caused the increase. Vague statements can weaken your argument and confuse the reader. Always provide context and supporting details.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "led to an increase" functions as a causal connector, linking a cause to its effect, where the effect is a rise or growth in something. Ludwig AI confirms that this is correct and widely used in various contexts.
Frequent in
Science
38%
News & Media
40%
Academia
6%
Less common in
Formal & Business
2%
Encyclopedias
1%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "led to an increase" is a commonly used phrase that expresses a cause-and-effect relationship, indicating that one thing directly resulted in a rise or growth in another. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use across various domains, especially science, news and media. When using this phrase, it's important to ensure that the causal connection is clear and supported by relevant evidence. Consider using alternatives like "resulted in a growth" or "gave rise to a surge" for variety and precision, depending on the nuances you wish to convey. Being specific about the cause is crucial to avoid vagueness and enhance the clarity of your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
resulted in a growth
Replaces "led to" with "resulted in" and "increase" with "growth", focusing on the outcome of the action.
generated a growth of
Substitutes "led to" with "generated", emphasizing the creation or production of the increase, and uses "growth" as a general term for increase.
gave rise to a surge
Uses "gave rise to" instead of "led to", and "surge" instead of "increase", implying a sudden and significant rise.
contributed to an escalation
Employs "contributed to" to show partial causality and "escalation" to suggest a gradual increase in intensity or extent.
caused a boost in
Substitutes "led to" with "caused" for direct causation, and "boost" for a more positive or energetic increase.
precipitated a jump in
Replaces "led to" with "precipitated", indicating a sudden or unexpected cause, and "jump" for a quick increase.
fostered an expansion of
Uses "fostered" to suggest a nurturing or supportive cause, and "expansion" for a more comprehensive increase.
triggered a climb in
Substitutes "led to" with "triggered" suggesting a catalyst, and "climb" for a gradual increase.
instigated a swell in
Replaces "led to" with "instigated", implying initiation or prompting, and "swell" for a gradual increase in size or volume.
produced an uptick in
Uses "produced" instead of "led to", and "uptick" for a small, incremental increase.
FAQs
How can I use "led to an increase" in a sentence?
Use "led to an increase" to show a direct cause-and-effect relationship where something resulted in a rise or growth. For example, "The new marketing campaign "led to an increase" in sales."
What are some alternatives to "led to an increase"?
You can use phrases like "resulted in a growth", "gave rise to a surge", or "contributed to an escalation" depending on the context.
Is it better to say "led to an increase of" or "led to an increase in"?
Both are grammatically correct, but "led to an increase in" is generally preferred and more commonly used. For example, "The new policy "led to an increase in" student enrollment" is more natural than "led to an increase of student enrollment."
What's the difference between "led to an increase" and "resulted in a decrease"?
"Led to an increase" indicates a positive change or growth, while "resulted in a decrease" indicates a negative change or reduction. They are opposite in meaning.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested