Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

led at

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "led at" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is not a standard expression and may confuse readers, as it lacks context and clarity. Example: "The team was led at the conference by their project manager."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Don Bosco led at the half, 21 7.

News & Media

The New Yorker

led at halftime, 40-27.

Texas led at halftime, 44-39.

The Knicks led at halftime, 50-48.

Indiana led at the half, 53-42.

Michigan State led at halftime, 19-17.

It led at halftime by 41-28.

They even led at half-time.

News & Media

The Times

They led at halftime, another first for 2013.

The 76ers led at the half, 45-41.

They led at the end of the first three quarters.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "led at", carefully consider if "led by" or another alternative more accurately conveys your intended meaning. "Led by" often indicates who or what is doing the leading, which is often more precise.

Common error

Avoid using "led at" when you mean "led by". The preposition "by" is more appropriate when indicating who or what is in charge or directing something. For example, instead of "The project was led at John", say "The project was led by John".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

3.2/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "led at" is to act as a verb phrase aiming to describe guidance or leadership, however, this construction is often considered grammatically incorrect or awkward. Ludwig AI highlights this issue, suggesting that alternative phrasing is generally preferred for clarity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Academia

20%

Science

19%

Less common in

Wiki

11%

Formal & Business

7%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "led at" appears frequently in various sources, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect or at least awkward. According to Ludwig AI, alternative phrasing such as "led by", "was in the lead", or "took the helm" is usually preferable for clarity and grammatical correctness. The phrase surfaces most often in News & Media and Academic contexts. When writing, it's best to avoid "led at" and opt for more precise language to ensure your message is clear and grammatically sound.

FAQs

How can I rephrase a sentence that uses "led at" to make it grammatically correct?

Replace "led at" with phrases like "led by", "was in the lead", or "took the helm", depending on the intended meaning.

What's the difference between "led by" and "led at"?

"Led by" indicates who or what is doing the leading (e.g., "The team was led by the captain"), while "led at" is often grammatically incorrect or awkwardly phrased. It's better to use "led by" for clarity.

Is "led at" ever correct in a sentence?

While instances of "led at" exist, they are often grammatically dubious or require rephrasing for clarity. Typically, "led by" or another prepositional phrase provides better precision and correctness.

What are some common mistakes people make when using the word "led"?

A frequent mistake is using "led at" instead of "led by". Additionally, ensure you are using the correct tense of "lead" (lead, led, leading) in your sentences.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

3.2/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: